Open Stack

I would drop the entire subprojects section at the very bottom. It is
functionally a mix of statuses, priorities for review, and out of
date. I doubt the wiki page for 3rd party CI's is really useful as
well.

I guess it is very verbose, possibly too much so, but given the end of
the cycle we do need to trim back all of the updates anyhow. Overall,
I the non-update related portion is much cleaner, which I think was
the goal :)

On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 10:32 AM Jay Faulkner
<jay.faulkner at verizonmedia.com> wrote:
>
> > Also a formatting adjustment, change the size/style of the characters to have a better visual separation between topic name and content in the status report section.
>
> I left the subteam status area mostly alone, as many of the status updates appeared to be out of date or for features that are already landed or not being worked on. I added an item to the next meetings' agenda to discuss this.
>
> I'll add the other links you suggested. Thanks!
>
> -
> Jay Faulkner
>
> On Mon, Apr 19, 2021 at 1:38 AM Riccardo Pittau <elfosardo at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> That looks great, thanks!
>> I would probably just add a link to https://ironicbaremetal.org/ and to the meeting page https://wiki.openstack.org/wiki/Meetings/Ironic at the very top in the first section.
>> Also a formatting adjustment, change the size/style of the characters to have a better visual separation between topic name and content in the status report section.
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Riccardo
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 6:31 PM Jay Faulkner <jay.faulkner at verizonmedia.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Iury and I spent some time this morning updating the Ironic whiteboard etherpad to include more immediately useful information to contributors.
>>>
>>> We placed this updated whiteboard at https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/IronicWhiteBoardv2 -- our approach was to prune any outdated/broken links or information, and focus on making the first part of the whiteboard an easy one-click place for folks to see easy ways to contribute. All the rest of the information was carried over and reformatted.
>>>
>>> Once there is consensus from the team about this being a positive change, we should either replace the existing IronicWhiteBoard with the contents of the v2 page, or just update links to point to the new one instead.
>>>
>>> What do you all think?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Jay Faulkner