Open Stack

On Fri, 9 Apr 2021 at 02:04, Tony Liu <tonyliu0592 at hotmail.com> wrote:
>
> I have RHEL subscription and I want to know if it's possible
> to use Kolla deploy OpenStack. It's supposed to be yes based
> on the doc. I just want to know where I can get container
> images. The container image on RedHat is only for TripleO.

Hi Tony,

RHEL support is one of those things that was added a long time ago,
but is not tested in CI. It is therefore likely to break at any point,
especially now that Tripleo does not use Kolla images. I know that RH
were pushing the UBI images, and I don't think we've actively done
anything to move to those.

We've added the future of RHEL support as a discussion topic for the
PTG [1]. If you are interested, I recommend that you attend, or at
least add some notes to the Etherpad.

Thanks,
Mark

[1] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/kolla-xena-ptg

>
>
> Thanks!
> Tony
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: CHALANSONNET Stéphane (Acoss) <stephane.chalansonnet at acoss.fr>
> > Sent: Thursday, April 8, 2021 1:29 PM
> > To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: RE: [kolla] RHEL based container image (Tony Liu)
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > You need an active subscription RHOSP for doing that , but Kolla was not
> > supported by Redhat unfortunely ...
> >
> > Stéphane Chalansonnet
> >
> >
> > -----Message d'origine-----
> > De : openstack-discuss-request at lists.openstack.org <openstack-discuss-
> > request at lists.openstack.org>
> > Envoyé : jeudi 8 avril 2021 22:04
> > À : openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> > Objet : openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 30, Issue 56
> >
> > Send openstack-discuss mailing list submissions to
> >       openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> >
> > To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >       http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-
> > discuss
> > or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >       openstack-discuss-request at lists.openstack.org
> >
> > You can reach the person managing the list at
> >       openstack-discuss-owner at lists.openstack.org
> >
> > When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> > "Re: Contents of openstack-discuss digest..."
> >
> >
> > Today's Topics:
> >
> >    1. Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of
> >       openstack/eslint-config-openstack for ref refs/tags/4.1.0 failed
> >       (Jeremy Stanley)
> >    2. Re: [zun][kuryr][neutron] Missing vxlan ports in br-tun for
> >       Zun containers? (Jason Anderson)
> >    3. [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge
> >       discussions at the PTG (Ildiko Vancsa)
> >    4. Re: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the
> >       edge discussions at the PTG (John Fulton)
> >    5. [kolla] RHEL based container image (Tony Liu)
> >
> >
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 1
> > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 16:50:37 +0000
> > From: Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org>
> > To: openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> > Subject: Re: [Release-job-failures] Release of
> >       openstack/eslint-config-openstack for ref refs/tags/4.1.0 failed
> > Message-ID: <20210408165036.6tkcfwwix5ms3ig4 at yuggoth.org>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > On 2021-04-08 11:54:16 +0200 (+0200), Herve Beraud wrote:
> > [...]
> > > I proposed a patch to move to nodejs10 all our projects that depend on
> > > nodejs:
> > >
> > > https://review.opendev.org/c/openstack/project-config/+/785353
> > >
> > > When this patch will be merged I think that this job could be
> > reenqueued.
> >
> > I reenqueued the tag, but release-openstack-javascript failed on a
> > different problem. NPM complains that there's already a eslint-config-
> > openstack 4.0.1 published which can't be overwritten, but the tag is for
> > 4.1.0... someone should probably update the version parameter in eslint-
> > config-openstack's package.json file, which means it'll need another
> > release tagged anyway (4.1.1?).
> > --
> > Jeremy Stanley
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
> > Name: signature.asc
> > Type: application/pgp-signature
> > Size: 833 bytes
> > Desc: not available
> > URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-
> > discuss/attachments/20210408/961aecf4/attachment-0001.sig>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 2
> > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 17:00:19 +0000
> > From: Jason Anderson <jasonanderson at uchicago.edu>
> > To: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> > Subject: Re: [zun][kuryr][neutron] Missing vxlan ports in br-tun for
> >       Zun containers?
> > Message-ID: <0A70CB1A-35AA-4782-8BF3-496080E47341 at uchicago.edu>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > As usual, “rubber ducking” the openstack-discuss list yielded fruit. It
> > turns out that I didn’t have the l2population mechanism driver enabled.
> > I thought this was optional for some reason. It looks like enabling this
> > and restarting the neutorn-openvswitch-agent has fixed connectivity!
> >
> > /Jason
> >
> > > On Apr 8, 2021, at 11:20 AM, Jason Anderson
> > <jasonanderson at uchicago.edu> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hello stackers,
> > >
> > > I’m interested in using zun to launch containers and assign floating
> > IPs via neutron to those containers. I am deploying zun, kuryr-
> > libnetwork, and neutron with kolla-ansible on the Train release. I’ve
> > configured neutron with one physical network and I’d like to use a VXLAN
> > overlay for tenant networks.
> > >
> > > What works:
> > > - I can launch containers on a neutron tenant network, they start
> > successfully, they get an IP and can reach each other if they’re co-
> > located on a single host.
> > > - I can create all my neutron networks, routers, subnets, without
> > (obvious) errors.
> > > - I can update security groups on the container and see the iptables
> > rules updated appropriately.
> > > - I can directly create Docker networks using the kuryr driver/type.
> > >
> > > What doesn’t work:
> > > - I can’t see any vxlan ports on the br-tun OVS bridge
> > > - I can’t access the exposed container ports from the control/network
> > > node via the router netns
> > > - Because of that, I can’t assign floating IPs because NAT effectively
> > > won’t work to reach the containers
> > >
> > > The fact that there are no ports on br-tun is supicious, but I’m not
> > sure how this is supposed to work. I don’t see anything weird in
> > neutron-openvswitch-agent logs but those logs are quite noisy and I’m
> > not sure what to look for.
> > >
> > > Has anybody deployed such a setup / are there limitations I should
> > know about?
> > >
> > > Thank you!
> > >
> > >
> > > Jason Anderson
> > >
> > > DevOps Lead, Chameleon
> > >
> > > ---
> > >
> > > Department of Computer Science, University of Chicago Mathematics and
> > > Computer Science, Argonne National Laboratory
> > > jasonanderson at uchicago.edu
> > >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 3
> > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 19:18:54 +0200
> > From: Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com>
> > To: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> > Subject: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the edge
> >       discussions at the PTG
> > Message-ID: <0A7B1EBD-0715-43ED-B388-A2011D437DD0 at gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain;     charset=utf-8
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > I’m reaching out to draw your attention to the Edge Computing Group
> > sessions on the PTG in less than two weeks.
> >
> > We are still formalizing our agenda, but we have storage identified as
> > one of the topics that the working group would like to discuss. It would
> > be great to have the session also as a continuation to earlier
> > discussions that we had on previous PTGs with relevant OpenStack project
> > contributors.
> >
> > We have a few cross-community sessions scheduled already, but we still
> > have some flexibility in our agenda to schedule this topic so the most
> > people who are interested in participating can join. Our available
> > options are:
> >
> > * Monday (April 19) between 1400 UTC and 1500 UTC
> > * Tuesday (April) between 1400 UTC and 1600 UTC
> >
> > __Please let me know if you or your project would like to participate
> > and if you have a time slot difference from the above.__
> >
> > Thanks and Best Regards,
> > Ildikó
> > (IRC ildikov on Freenode)
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 4
> > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 13:39:45 -0400
> > From: John Fulton <johfulto at redhat.com>
> > To: Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com>
> > Cc: OpenStack Discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> > Subject: Re: [edge][cinder][manila][swift][tripleo] Storage at the
> >       edge discussions at the PTG
> > Message-ID:
> >       <CAE66OMCQWZFB+7SM1amzRr1Vq3pOm=fEgtQTuHLh0=0PPXy-sQ at mail.gmail.com>
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 1:21 PM Ildiko Vancsa <ildiko.vancsa at gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I’m reaching out to draw your attention to the Edge Computing Group
> > > sessions on the PTG in less than two weeks.
> > >
> > > We are still formalizing our agenda, but we have storage identified as
> > > one of the topics that the working group would like to discuss. It
> > > would be great to have the session also as a continuation to earlier
> > > discussions that we had on previous PTGs with relevant OpenStack
> > project contributors.
> > >
> > > We have a few cross-community sessions scheduled already, but we still
> > > have some flexibility in our agenda to schedule this topic so the most
> > > people who are interested in participating can join. Our available
> > > options
> > > are:
> > >
> > > * Monday (April 19) between 1400 UTC and 1500 UTC
> > > * Tuesday (April) between 1400 UTC and 1600 UTC
> > >
> >
> > I'm not available Monday but could join Tuesday. I'd be curious to hear
> > what others are doing with Storage on the Edge and could share some info
> > on how TripleO does it.
> >
> >   John
> >
> >
> > >
> > > __Please let me know if you or your project would like to participate
> > > and if you have a time slot difference from the above.__
> > >
> > > Thanks and Best Regards,
> > > Ildikó
> > > (IRC ildikov on Freenode)
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > -------------- next part --------------
> > An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> > URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-
> > discuss/attachments/20210408/ac34d099/attachment-0001.html>
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Message: 5
> > Date: Thu, 8 Apr 2021 20:04:04 +0000
> > From: Tony Liu <tonyliu0592 at hotmail.com>
> > To: "openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org"
> >       <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> > Subject: [kolla] RHEL based container image
> > Message-ID:
> >       <MWHPR08MB2382486467C9EE24247052B9BD749 at MWHPR08MB2382.namprd08.prod
> > .outlook.com>
> >
> > Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > Given [1], RHEL based container is supported on RHEL 8 by Kolla.
> > Where can I get RHEL based container images? I see CentOS and Ubuntu
> > based images on docker hub, but can't find RHEL based images.
> >
> > [1] https://docs.openstack.org/kolla-ansible/ussuri/user/support-
> > matrix.html
> >
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Tony
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > Subject: Digest Footer
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > openstack-discuss mailing list
> > openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org
> > http://lists.openstack.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/openstack-discuss
> >
> >
> > ------------------------------
> >
> > End of openstack-discuss Digest, Vol 30, Issue 56
> > *************************************************