[oslo][release][QA] devstack-plugin-(kafka|amqp1) retirement

Herve Beraud hberaud at redhat.com
Thu Apr 1 15:44:21 UTC 2021


>From my point of view I would argue that yes, however, I don't have the big
picture.

Le jeu. 1 avr. 2021 à 17:42, Luigi Toscano <ltoscano at redhat.com> a écrit :

> On Thursday, 1 April 2021 17:28:25 CEST Herve Beraud wrote:
> > Le jeu. 1 avr. 2021 à 17:02, Ben Nemec <openstack at nemebean.com> a écrit
> :
> > > On 4/1/21 6:24 AM, Herve Beraud wrote:
> > > > Hello Osloers,
> > > >
> > > > Our devstack plugins (kafka and amqp1) didn't show a great amount of
> > > > activity since ussuri, does it still make sense to maintain them?
> > > >
> > > > The latest available SHAs for the both projects comes from Victoria
> > > > (merged in this period).
> > > >
> > > > Can we retire them or simply retire them from the coordinated
> releases?
> > >
> > > These have never been released and are no longer branched. What is
> their
> > > involvement in the coordinated release at this point?
> >
> > Yes these deliverables are tagless so no released at all, however, they
> are
> > coordinated so they are branched during each series.
> >
> > Though, as said Ben, those deliverables haven't been branched during the
> > previous series (victoria), we suppose that they have been simply
> forgotten
> > inadvertently,
> >
> > I proposed a patch to fix that point [1].
>
> Other devstack plugins are branchless (devstack-plugin-ceph,
> devstack-plugin-
> nfs), couldn't those be branchless too?
>
>
> --
> Luigi
>
>
>

-- 
Hervé Beraud
Senior Software Engineer at Red Hat
irc: hberaud
https://github.com/4383/
https://twitter.com/4383hberaud
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=ECSj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20210401/e2449bf3/attachment.html>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list