Open Stack

On Tue, Sep 29, 2020 at 10:36 AM Yatin Karel <ykarel at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 1:08 PM Marios Andreou <marios at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 10:16 AM Yatin Karel <ykarel at redhat.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hi Marios,
> >>
> >> << we don't normally/aren't expected to cut release candidates.
> >> However after discussion with and guidance from Wes I decided to
> >> propose an rc1 as practice since I << haven't used the new releases
> >> tool before [4].
> >> << The proposal is up at [1] but I've set -1 there on request from
> >> reviewers; we can't merge that until [2] merges first.
> >>
> >> Is this just about releasing RC Tags or changing the release-model
> >> that tripleo used to follow:- cycle-with-intermediary(cycle-trailing
> >> earlier) vs cycle-with-rc. Maybe you can share more context with the
> >
> >
> > this is just about bumping the git tags on the projects and not about
> changing the release model.
> >
> >>
> >> discussion points as to what's different this time and reasoning for
> >> the same to have a clear picture.
> >
> >
> > nothing different wrt the release model - see the diff it is just
> bumping the hash and version
> https://review.opendev.org/gitweb?p=openstack%2Freleases.git;a=commitdiff;h=43cca15e8525992f6c3bfba68d3421c64c960bf9
> . We are just making a release to coincide with the wider openstack
> Victoria RC1 even though we aren't expected to follow the rc model with our
> 'cycle with intermediary' on these projects.
> >
>
> >>
> >> And if possible can you also share what's the plan for GA release for
> >> TripleO like how it will be this time.
> >
> >
> > So weshay is still PTL, and we haven't discussed this in any great
> detail, except that we may have to delay a little bit cutting branch and
> releasing victoria final.
> >
> >> Generally with rc tags stable branch is also cut but i don't see that
> >> in https://review.opendev.org/#/c/754346/. And i hope this will not be
> >
> >
> > right I guess the confusion is that this isn't a proper RC since we
> don't have those 'officially' .It is just a version bump that coincides
> with the victoria rc1 milestone end of last week.
> >
>
> To me what caused the confusion is releasing an RC candidate without a
> stable/ branch for branched projects like Tripleo's and the missing
> why's on doing differently this time and how doing differently this
> time will help.
>

Sure - thanks for helping me clarify it. It is my fault for calling it an
RC since it is not a proper RC.
I updated the commit message https://review.opendev.org/#/c/754346/ so it
is clearer now

thanks, marios


>
>
> > hope it helps, also, did you forget to reply-all? should i send to the
> list (just confirmed with ykarel and re-adding list to addresses)
> >
> > thanks,
> >
> > marios
> >
> >>
> >> merged until victoria tripleo jobs are ready if cutting
> >> stable/victoria branch.
> >>
> >> On Fri, Sep 25, 2020 at 10:05 PM Marios Andreou <marios at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >> >
> >> > hello TripleO folks o/
> >> >
> >> > we don't normally/aren't expected to cut release candidates. However
> after discussion with and guidance from Wes I decided to propose an rc1 as
> practice since I haven't used the new releases tool before [4].
> >> >
> >> > The proposal is up at [1] but I've set -1 there on request from
> reviewers; we can't merge that until [2] merges first.
> >> >
> >> > If you are interested please check [1] and add any comments. In
> particular let me know if you want to include a release for one of the
> independent repos [3] (though for validations-common/libs we need to reach
> out to the validations team they are managing those AFAIK).
> >> >
> >> > thanks, hope you enjoy your weekend!
> >> >
> >> > [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/754346/
> >> > [2] https://review.opendev.org/754347
> >> > [3] https://releases.openstack.org/teams/tripleo.html#independent
> >> > [4]
> https://releases.openstack.org/reference/using.html#using-new-release-command
> >>
> >> Thanks and Regards
> >> Yatin Karel
> >>
>
> Thanks and Regards
> Yatin Karel
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200929/5b2ab83d/attachment-0001.html>