[placement][nova][cinder][neutron][blazar] Placement governance switch(back)
Balázs Gibizer
balazs.gibizer at est.tech
Mon Sep 28 11:04:48 UTC 2020
On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 18:12, Luigi Toscano <ltoscano at redhat.com>
wrote:
> On Thursday, 24 September 2020 17:23:36 CEST Stephen Finucane wrote:
>
>> Assuming no one steps forward for the Placement PTL role, it would
>> appear to me that we have two options. Either we look at
>> transitioning
>> Placement to a PTL-less project, or we move it back under nova
>> governance. To be honest, given how important placement is to nova
>> and
>> other projects now, I'm uncomfortable with the idea of not having a
>> point person who is ultimately responsible for things like cutting a
>> release (yes, delegation is encouraged but someone needs to herd the
>> cats). At the same time, I do realize that placement is used by more
>> that nova now so nova cores and what's left of the separate
>> placement
>> core team shouldn't be the only ones making this decision.
>>
>> So, assuming the worst happens and placement is left without a PTL
>> for
>> Victoria, what do we want to do?
>
> I mentioned this on IRC, but just for completeness, there is another
> option:
> have the Nova candidate PTL (I assume there is just one) also apply
> for
> Placement PTL, and handle the 2 realms in a personal union.
As far as I know I'm the only nova PTL candidate so basically you
asking me to take the Placement PTL role as well. This is a valid
option. Still, first, I would like to give a chance to the DPL concept
in Placement in a way yoctozepto suggested.
Cheers,
gibi
>
> Ciao
> --
> Luigi
>
>
>
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list