[placement][nova][cinder][neutron][blazar] Placement governance switch(back)
Ghanshyam Mann
gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Thu Sep 24 16:11:53 UTC 2020
---- On Thu, 24 Sep 2020 11:00:10 -0500 Radosław Piliszek <radoslaw.piliszek at gmail.com> wrote ----
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 5:24 PM Stephen Finucane <stephenfin at redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Placement has been a separate project with its own governance since
> > Stein [1]. Since then, the main drivers behind the separation have
> > moved onto pastures new and with Tetsuro sadly declaring his non-
> > candidacy for the PTL position for Wallaby [2], we're left in the
> > unenviable position of potentially not having a PTL for the Wallaby
> > cycle. As such, it's probably time to discuss the future of Placement
> > governance.
> >
> > Assuming no one steps forward for the Placement PTL role, it would
> > appear to me that we have two options. Either we look at transitioning
> > Placement to a PTL-less project, or we move it back under nova
> > governance. To be honest, given how important placement is to nova and
> > other projects now, I'm uncomfortable with the idea of not having a
> > point person who is ultimately responsible for things like cutting a
> > release (yes, delegation is encouraged but someone needs to herd the
> > cats). At the same time, I do realize that placement is used by more
> > that nova now so nova cores and what's left of the separate placement
> > core team shouldn't be the only ones making this decision.
> >
> > So, assuming the worst happens and placement is left without a PTL for
> > Victoria, what do we want to do?
>
> Run DPL with liaisons from the interested projects perhaps? :-)
+1, this is good way to share the responsibilty.
-gmann
>
> > Stephen
> >
> > PS: Apologies if I missed other projects with an interest in placement.
> > I did try to catch them all /o\
>
> I know of Zun.
>
> -yoctozepto
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list