[Neutron][FFE][requirements] request for QoS policy update for bound ports feature

Lajos Katona katonalala at gmail.com
Wed Sep 16 12:39:27 UTC 2020


Hi
The neutron-lib patch (https://review.opendev.org/750349 ) is a bug fix
(see [1]) which as do not touch db or API can be backported later in the
worst case.
The fix itself doesn't affect other Neutron features, so no harm.

Thanks for your help.
Regards
Lajos Katona (lajoskatona)

[1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894825

Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. szept. 15.,
K, 18:05):

> > I would like to ask for FFE for the RFE "allow replacing the QoS
> > policy of bound port", [1].
> > This feature adds the extra step to port update operation to change
> > the allocation in Placement to the min_kbps values of the new QoS
> > policy, if the port has a QoS policy with minimum_bandwidth rule and
> > is bound and used by a server.
> >
> > In neutron there's one open patch:
> > https://review.opendev.org/747774
> >
> > There's an open bug report for the neutron-lib side:
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1894825 (placement story:
> > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008111 )  and a fix for that:
> > https://review.opendev.org/750349
> >
> > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1882804
> >
> Since this requires an update to neutron-lib, adding [requirements] to
> the subject. Non-client library freeze was two weeks ago now, so it's a
> bit late.
>
> The fix looks fairly minor, but I don't know that code. Can you comment
> on the potential risks of this change? We should be stabilizing as much
> as possible at this point as we approach the final victoria release date.
>
> Sean
>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200916/2a4fb666/attachment-0001.html>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list