Hi The neutron-lib patch (https://review.opendev.org/750349 ) is a bug fix (see [1]) which as do not touch db or API can be backported later in the worst case. The fix itself doesn't affect other Neutron features, so no harm. Thanks for your help. Regards Lajos Katona (lajoskatona) [1] https://launchpad.net/bugs/1894825 Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2020. szept. 15., K, 18:05): > > I would like to ask for FFE for the RFE "allow replacing the QoS > > policy of bound port", [1]. > > This feature adds the extra step to port update operation to change > > the allocation in Placement to the min_kbps values of the new QoS > > policy, if the port has a QoS policy with minimum_bandwidth rule and > > is bound and used by a server. > > > > In neutron there's one open patch: > > https://review.opendev.org/747774 > > > > There's an open bug report for the neutron-lib side: > > https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1894825 (placement story: > > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008111 ) and a fix for that: > > https://review.opendev.org/750349 > > > > [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/neutron/+bug/1882804 > > > Since this requires an update to neutron-lib, adding [requirements] to > the subject. Non-client library freeze was two weeks ago now, so it's a > bit late. > > The fix looks fairly minor, but I don't know that code. Can you comment > on the potential risks of this change? We should be stabilizing as much > as possible at this point as we approach the final victoria release date. > > Sean > > > > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200916/2a4fb666/attachment-0001.html>