[all][tc][goals] Migrate CI/CD jobs to new Ubuntu LTS Focal: Week R-4 Update
Radosław Piliszek
radoslaw.piliszek at gmail.com
Fri Sep 11 12:13:14 UTC 2020
I agree with Michał that it kind of breaks the purpose of lower-constraints.
Supposedly lower-constraints should just be tested with the lowest
supported python version?
WDYT, Folks?
(That said, lots of projects already made lower-constraints break on
RDO due to these bumps.)
-yoctozepto
On Fri, Sep 11, 2020 at 2:02 PM Michał Dulko <mdulko at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 2020-09-09 at 14:05 -0500, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
> > ---- On Tue, 08 Sep 2020 17:56:05 -0500 Ghanshyam Mann <
> > gmann at ghanshyammann.com> wrote ----
> > > Updates:
> > > After working more on failing one today and listing the blocking
> > one, I think we are good to switch tox based testing today
> > > and discuss the integration testing switch tomorrow in TC office
> > hours.
> > >
> > > > * Part1: Migrating tox base job tomorrow (8th Sept):
> > >
> > > I have checked it again and fixed many repos that are up for
> > review and merge. Most python clients are already fixed
> > > or their fixes are up for merge so they can make it before the
> > feature freeze on 10th. If any repo is broken then it will be pretty
> > quick
> > > to fix by lower constraint bump (see the example under
> > https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:migrate-to-focal)
> > >
> > > Even if any of the fixes miss the victoria release then those can
> > be backported easily. I am opening the tox base jobs migration to
> > merge:
> > > - All patches in this series
> > https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738328/
> >
> > All these tox base jobs are merged now and running on Focal. If any
> > of your repo is failing, please fix on priority or ping me on IRC if
> > failure not clear.
> > You can find most of the fixes for possible failure in this topic:
> > -
> > https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:migrate-to-focal+(status:open+OR+status:merged)
> >
> > -gmann
>
> We're in a bit of a pickle here. So with kuryr-kubernetes we aim to
> keep lower-constraints on the versions that can be found in
> CentOS/RHEL8 and seems like cffi 1.11.5 won't compile with Python 3.8.
> What should we do here? Is such assumption even possible given broader
> OpenStack assumptions?
>
> > >
> > >
> > > > * Part2: Migrating devstack/tempest base job on 10th sept:
> > >
> > > We have three blocking open bugs here so I would like to discuss
> > it in tomorrow's TC office hour also about how to proceed on this.
> > >
> > > 1. Nova: https://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/+bug/1882521 (
> > https://bugs.launchpad.net/qemu/+bug/1894804)
> > > 2. Barbican: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007732
> > > 3. Ceilometer: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008121
> > >
> > >
> > > -gmann
> > >
> > >
> > > ---- On Mon, 07 Sep 2020 09:29:40 -0500 Ghanshyam Mann <
> > gmann at ghanshyammann.com> wrote ----
> > > > Hello Everyone,
> > > >
> > > > Please find the week R-4 updates on 'Ubuntu Focal migration'
> > community goal. Its time to force the base jobs migration which can
> > > > break the projects gate if not yet taken care of. Read below
> > for the plan.
> > > >
> > > > Tracking: https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007865
> > > >
> > > > Progress:
> > > > =======
> > > > * We are close to V-3 release and this is time we have to
> > complete this migration otherwise doing it in RC period can add
> > > > unnecessary and last min delay. I am going to plan this
> > migration in two-part. This will surely break some projects gate
> > > > which is not yet finished the migration but we have to do at
> > some time. Please let me know if any objection to the below
> > > > plan.
> > > >
> > > > * Part1: Migrating tox base job tomorrow (8th Sept):
> > > >
> > > > ** I am going to open tox base jobs migration (doc, unit,
> > functional, lower-constraints etc) to merge by tomorrow. which is
> > this
> > > > series (all base patches of this):
> > https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738328/ .
> > > >
> > > > **There are few repos still failing on requirements lower-
> > constraints job specifically which I tried my best to fix as many as
> > possible.
> > > > Many are ready to merge also. Please merge or work on your
> > projects repo testing before that or fix on priority if failing.
> > > >
> > > > * Part2: Migrating devstack/tempest base job on 10th sept:
> > > >
> > > > * We have few open bugs for this which are not yet resolved, we
> > will see how it goes but the current plan is to migrate by 10th Sept.
> > > >
> > > > ** Bug#1882521
> > > > ** DB migration issues,
> > > > *** alembic and few on telemetry/gnocchi side
> > https://github.com/sqlalchemy/alembic/issues/699,
> > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008003
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Testing Till now:
> > > > ============
> > > > * ~200 repos gate have been tested or fixed till now.
> > > > **
> > https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:migrate-to-focal+(status:abandoned+OR+status:merged)
> > > >
> > > > * ~100 repos are under test and failing. Debugging and fixing
> > are in progress (If you would like to help, please check your
> > > > project repos if I am late to fix them):
> > > > **
> > https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:migrate-to-focal+status:open
> > > >
> > > > * ~30repos fixes ready to merge:
> > > > **
> > https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:migrate-to-focal+status:open+label%3AVerified%3E%3D1%2Czuul+NOT+label%3AWorkflow%3C%3D-1
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Bugs Report:
> > > > ==========
> > > >
> > > > 1. Bug#1882521. (IN-PROGRESS)
> > > > There is open bug for nova/cinder where three tempest tests are
> > failing for
> > > > volume detach operation. There is no clear root cause found yet
> > > > -https://bugs.launchpad.net/cinder/+bug/1882521
> > > > We have skipped the tests in tempest base patch to proceed with
> > the other
> > > > projects testing but this is blocking things for the migration.
> > > >
> > > > 2. DB migration issues (IN-PROGRESS)
> > > > * alembic and few on telemetry/gnocchi side
> > https://github.com/sqlalchemy/alembic/issues/699,
> > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2008003
> > > >
> > > > 3. We encountered the nodeset name conflict with x/tobiko.
> > (FIXED)
> > > > nodeset conflict is resolved now and devstack provides all
> > focal nodes now.
> > > >
> > > > 4. Bug#1886296. (IN-PROGRESS)
> > > > pyflakes till 2.1.0 is not compatible with python 3.8 which is
> > the default python version
> > > > on ubuntu focal[1]. With pep8 job running on focal faces the
> > issue and fail. We need to bump
> > > > the pyflakes to 2.1.1 as min version to run pep8 jobs on py3.8.
> > > > As of now, many projects are using old hacking version so I am
> > explicitly adding pyflakes>=2.1.1
> > > > on the project side[2] but for the long term easy maintenance,
> > I am doing it in 'hacking' requirements.txt[3]
> > > > nd will release a new hacking version. After that project can
> > move to new hacking and do not need
> > > > to maintain pyflakes version compatibility.
> > > >
> > > > 5. Bug#1886298. (IN-PROGRESS)
> > > > 'Markupsafe' 1.0 is not compatible with the latest version of
> > setuptools[4],
> > > > We need to bump the lower-constraint for Markupsafe to 1.1.1 to
> > make it work.
> > > > There are a few more issues[5] with lower-constraint jobs which
> > I am debugging.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > What work to be done on the project side:
> > > > ================================
> > > > This goal is more of testing the jobs on focal and fixing bugs
> > if any otherwise
> > > > migrate jobs by switching the nodeset to focal node sets
> > defined in devstack.
> > > >
> > > > 1. Start a patch in your repo by making depends-on on either of
> > below:
> > > > devstack base patch if you are using only devstack base jobs
> > not tempest:
> > > >
> > > > Depends-on: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/731207/
> > > > OR
> > > > tempest base patch if you are using the tempest base job (like
> > devstack-tempest):
> > > > Depends-on: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/734700/
> > > >
> > > > Both have depends-on on the series where I am moving
> > unit/functional/doc/cover/nodejs tox jobs to focal. So
> > > > you can test the complete gate
> > jobs(unit/functional/doc/integration) together.
> > > > This and its base patches -
> > https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738328/
> > > >
> > > > Example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738126/
> > > >
> > > > 2. If none of your project jobs override the nodeset then above
> > patch will be
> > > > testing patch(do not merge) otherwise change the nodeset to
> > focal.
> > > > Example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/737370/
> > > >
> > > > 3. If the jobs are defined in branchless repo and override the
> > nodeset then you need to override the branches
> > > > variant to adjust the nodeset so that those jobs run on Focal
> > on victoria onwards only. If no nodeset
> > > > is overridden then devstack being branched and stable base job
> > using bionic/xenial will take care of
> > > > this.
> > > > Example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744056/2
> > > >
> > > > 4. If no updates need you can abandon the testing patch (
> > https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744341/). If it need
> > > > updates then modify the same patch with proper commit msg, once
> > it pass the gate then remove the Depends-On
> > > > so that you can merge your patch before base jobs are switched
> > to focal. This way we make sure no gate downtime in
> > > > this migration.
> > > > Example: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744056/1..2//COMMIT_MSG
> > > >
> > > > Once we finish the testing on projects side and no failure then
> > we will merge the devstack and tempest
> > > > base patches.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Important things to note:
> > > > ===================
> > > > * Do not forgot to add the story and task link to your patch so
> > that we can track it smoothly.
> > > > * Use gerrit topic 'migrate-to-focal'
> > > > * Do not backport any of the patches.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > References:
> > > > =========
> > > > Goal doc:
> > https://governance.openstack.org/tc/goals/selected/victoria/migrate-ci-cd-jobs-to-ubuntu-focal.html
> > > > Storyboard tracking:
> > https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2007865
> > > >
> > > > [1] https://github.com/PyCQA/pyflakes/issues/367
> > > > [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739315/
> > > > [3] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739334/
> > > > [4] https://github.com/pallets/markupsafe/issues/116
> > > > [5]
> > https://zuul.opendev.org/t/openstack/build/7ecd9cf100194bc99b3b70fa1e6de032
> > > >
> > > > -gmann
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
>
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list