Open Stack

Hi Team,

FFE is not needed as the failures were related to tests only and does not
impact actual functionality.

Thanks & Best Regards,

Abhishek Kekane


On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:53 PM Abhishek Kekane <akekane at redhat.com> wrote:

> Hi Team,
>
> The reason for failure is we are suppressing Deprecation warning into
> error in glance [1] and we are using those deprecated parameters in
> glance_store.
> This is the reason why it is only failing in functional tests [2] and not
> in actual scenarios.
>
> [1]
> https://opendev.org/openstack/glance/src/branch/master/glance/tests/unit/fixtures.py#L133-L136
> [2]https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750144/
>
> Thanks & Best Regards,
>
> Abhishek Kekane
>
>
> On Tue, Sep 8, 2020 at 8:48 PM Rajat Dhasmana <rdhasman at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Team,
>>
>> Last week we released glance_store 2.3.0 which adds support for configuring cinder multiple stores as glance backend.
>> While adding functional tests in glance for the same [1], we have noticed that it is failing with some hard requirements from oslo side to use project_id instead of tenant and user_id instead of user.
>> It is really strange behavior as this failure occurs only in functional tests but works properly in the actual environment without any issue. The fix is proposed in glance_store [2] to resolve this issue.
>>
>> I would like to apply for FFE with this glance_store patch [2] to be approved and release a new version of glance_store 2.3.1.
>>
>> Kindly provide approval for the same.
>>
>> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750144/
>> [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750131/
>>
>> Thanks and Regards,
>> Rajat Dhasmana
>>
>>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200910/d022ba18/attachment.html>