[cinder][stable][infra] branch freeze for ocata, pike
Brian Rosmaita
rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com
Thu Sep 10 13:30:20 UTC 2020
On 9/10/20 8:40 AM, Előd Illés wrote:
> Hi Infra Team,
>
> While reviewing Andreas' patch [1], I have realized, that Cinder's
> stable/ocata and stable/pike branches were not deleted yet, however
> those branches were EOL'd already (see mail below).
>
> According to the process [2], since the EOL patches have merged already,
> if @Brian doesn't object, can you please delete
>
> - cinder stable/ocata
> - cinder stable/pike
I have no objection, but I haven't pushed the infra team about the
actual branch deletion because as far as I know, cinder is the first
project to actually request removal, and I suspect all sorts of stuff
will break. I suggest we wait until at least after RC-time to give us
all one less thing to worry about.
As far as avoiding breakage goes, I put up two patches to devstack so
that it will check out the -eol tag of cinder/brick/cinderclient instead
of the stable branch, but I suspect these only scratch the surface of
what can be broken once the cinder project branches are deleted.
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742953/
https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742952/
Sean suggested in an earlier thread on this topic [0] that instead of
deleting very old EM branches that some projects have EOL'd
project-by-project, we should just delete them wholesale across
openstack. That makes a lot of sense to me.
[0]
http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-May/015115.html
cheers,
brian
>
> Thanks in advance,
>
> Előd
>
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/750887/
> [2]
> https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/stable-branches.html#end-of-life
>
>
>
> On 2020. 07. 28. 16:23, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
>> tl;dr - do not approve any backports to stable/ocata or stable/pike in
>> any Cinder project deliverable
>>
>> stable/ocata has been tagged with ocata-eol in cinder, os-brick,
>> python-cinderclient, and python-brick-cinderclient-ext. Nothing
>> should be merged into stable/ocata in any of these repositories during
>> the interim period before the branches are deleted.
>>
>> stable/pike: the changes discussed in [0] have merged, and I've
>> proposed the pike-eol tags [1]. Nothing should be merged into
>> stable/pike in any of our code repositories from now until the
>> branches are deleted.
>>
>> [0]
>> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-July/016076.html
>>
>> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/742523/
>>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list