答复: [lists.openstack.org代发]Re: [placement][nova][cinder][neutron][blazar][tc][zun] Placement governance switch(back)
Brin Zhang(张百林)
zhangbailin at inspur.com
Mon Oct 12 09:37:12 UTC 2020
Hi, gibi, I am a contributor for nova and placement, and do many feature from Stein release, I would like to take on the role of *Release liaison*[1] in Placement to help more people.
Brin Zhang
-----邮件原件-----
发件人: Balázs Gibizer [mailto:balazs.gibizer at est.tech]
发送时间: 2020年10月5日 23:40
收件人: Luigi Toscano <ltoscano at redhat.com>
抄送: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
主题: [lists.openstack.org代发]Re: [placement][nova][cinder][neutron][blazar][tc][zun] Placement governance switch(back)
On Mon, Sep 28, 2020 at 13:04, Balázs Gibizer <balazs.gibizer at est.tech> wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 24, 2020 at 18:12, Luigi Toscano <ltoscano at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>> On Thursday, 24 September 2020 17:23:36 CEST Stephen Finucane wrote:
>>
>>> Assuming no one steps forward for the Placement PTL role, it would
>>> appear to me that we have two options. Either we look at
>>> transitioning Placement to a PTL-less project, or we move it back
>>> under nova governance. To be honest, given how important placement
>>> is to nova and other projects now, I'm uncomfortable with the
>>> idea of not having a point person who is ultimately responsible for
>>> things like cutting a release (yes, delegation is encouraged but
>>> someone needs to herd the cats). At the same time, I do realize
>>> that placement is used by more that nova now so nova cores and
>>> what's left of the separate placement core team shouldn't be the
>>> only ones making this decision.
>>>
>>> So, assuming the worst happens and placement is left without a PTL
>>> for Victoria, what do we want to do?
>>
>> I mentioned this on IRC, but just for completeness, there is another
>> option:
>> have the Nova candidate PTL (I assume there is just one) also apply
>> for Placement PTL, and handle the 2 realms in a personal union.
>
> As far as I know I'm the only nova PTL candidate so basically you
> asking me to take the Placement PTL role as well. This is a valid
> option. Still, first, I would like to give a chance to the DPL concept
> in Placement in a way yoctozepto suggested.
Bump. Do we 2-3 developers interested in running the Placement project in distributed project leadership[1] mode in Wallaby?
[1]
https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20200803-distributed-project-leadership.html
>
> Cheers,
> gibi
>
>>
>> Ciao
>> --
>> Luigi
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list