> I think I remember that a conscious decision was made to avoid using > symlinks for the bundles due to the hell that openstack-mojo-specs > descended into? Liam may want to wade in on this? > Broadly, this is one of the reasons I proposed submitting a review of a single charm to be a practical example of what this would look like, and how complex it would be. It should also help us, as a project, identify if the repetition is enough that symlinks, or refactoring the library, would be worthwhile. Chris -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_0x74BAF13D12E6A841.asc Type: application/pgp-keys Size: 10616 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20201005/f385b422/attachment-0001.key> -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: OpenPGP_signature Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20201005/f385b422/attachment-0001.sig>