[telemetry] wallaby cycle planning session

Rafael Weingärtner rafaelweingartner at gmail.com
Fri Nov 13 12:16:36 UTC 2020


I answered your doodle poll there. I think that we can work together to
find a solution for this unfortunate situation.
Keep me updated with the results of the poll.

On Thu, Nov 12, 2020 at 7:29 AM Matthias Runge <mrunge at matthias-runge.de>
wrote:

> Hi there,
>
> one of the biggest challenges for the telemetry stack is currently the
> state of gnocchi, which is... undefined/unfortunate/under-contributed/...?
>
> Telemetry started long time ago as a simple component ceilometer, which
> was split into several components ceilometer, aodh, panko, and gnocchi.
> Julien wrote a story about this some time ago[1].
>
> There has also been an attempt to fork gnocchi back to OpenStack[2].
>
> To my knowledge, the original contributors are not paid anymore to work
> on gnocchi, and at the same time, moving on to do something else is
> totally fine.
>
> However, I am not sure if we (in OpenStack Telemetry) should or could
> maintain in addition to the rest of the telemetry stack a time-series
> database. I'd like to discuss this during a call.
>
> Please select time(s) that suit you best in this poll[3].
>
> If you have questions or hints, don't hesitate to contact me.
>
> Thank you,
> Matthias
>
> [1] https://julien.danjou.info/lessons-from-openstack-telemetry-deflation/
> [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/744592/
> [3] https://doodle.com/poll/uqq328x5shr43awy
>
>

-- 
Rafael Weingärtner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20201113/42800f7f/attachment.html>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list