[tc][all][karbor] Retiring the Karbor project

Kendall Nelson kennelson11 at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 21:21:18 UTC 2020

Hello Everyone,

As you know, Karbor is a leaderless project for the Wallaby cycle,
which means there is no PTL
candidate to lead it in the Wallaby cycle. 'No PTL' and no liaisons
for DPL model is one of the criteria
which triggers TC to start checking the health, maintainers of the
project for dropping the project
from OpenStack Governance[1].

TC discussed the leaderless project in PTG[2] and checked if the
project has maintainers and what
activities are done in the Victoria development cycle. It seems no
functional changes in Karbor repos
except few gate fixes or community goal commits[3].

Based on all these checks and no maintainer for Karbor, TC decided to
drop this project from OpenStack
governance in the Wallaby cycle.  Ref: Mandatory Repository Retirement
resolution [4] and the detailed process
is in the project guide docs [5].

If your organization product/customer use/rely on this project then
this is the right time to step forward to
maintain it otherwise from the Wallaby cycle, Karbor will move out of
OpenStack governance by keeping
their repo under OpenStack namespace with an empty master branch with
'Not Maintained' message in README.
If someone from old or new maintainers shows interest to continue its
development then it can be re-added
to OpenStack governance.

With that thanks to Karbor contributors and PTLs (especially Pengju
Jiao) for maintaining this project.

-Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo)

[1] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/reference/dropping-projects.html
[2] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-wallaby-ptg
[3] https://www.stackalytics.com/?release=victoria&module=karbor-group&metric=commits
[4] https://governance.openstack.org/tc/resolutions/20190711-mandatory-repository-retirement.html
[5] https://docs.openstack.org/project-team-guide/repository.html#retiring-a-repository
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20201110/ee895c7c/attachment.html>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list