[tripleo][ci] Monday Nov 2
marios at redhat.com
Tue Nov 3 15:43:12 UTC 2020
On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 5:31 PM Wesley Hayutin <whayutin at redhat.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 3, 2020 at 6:20 AM Bogdan Dobrelya <bdobreli at redhat.com>
>> On 10/30/20 6:31 PM, Wesley Hayutin wrote:
>> > Greetings,
>> > The tripleo ci team has identified a handful of patches that we'd like
>> > to land prior to Nov 2, the day docker.io <http://docker.io> goes
>> > We've hit some new bugs and have also tuned a few things to try and
>> > make sure we can get patches to merge.
>> > Our current focus is across master, victoria, ussuri and centos-8
>> > and queens while reducing coverage in rocky and stein.
>> > A list of the prioritized gerrit reviews can be found here:
>> > https://hackmd.io/MlbZ_izSTEuZsCWTJvu_Kg?view
>> > The entire topic can be found here:
>> > https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:new-ci-job
>> In that list there are patches to puppet modules and openstack services
>> what run a single standalone tripleo CI job. I don't think creating an
>> extra provider job to run a single consumer job sounds reasonable.
>> > Thanks all.
> So our first pass there I think should be a content-provider. However we
> could potentially drop the content-provider and override docker.io ->
> quay.io as well. We are not certain yet how well quay.io will perform so
> we're being cautious atm.
or as currently discussing with sshnaidm on irc the job itself can build
the containers instead of having a content provider do that
17:38 < sshnaidm|rover> maybe in puppet repos we will just build containers?
17:38 < sshnaidm|rover> it's one standalone job there only, irrc
17:38 < sshnaidm|rover> I think bogdan is right
17:39 < marios> sshnaidm|rover: but is it worth it to special case that? in
the end it is still just 'build one
set of containers' does it matter if it happens in a
content provider or in the job itself? I
guess it depends how stable are the cotnent providers and
the answer is 'not always' ... :/
17:40 < sshnaidm|rover> marios, it will remain one job there, not two
17:40 < sshnaidm|rover> and no need to change layouts, just adding one
17:40 < sshnaidm|rover> these repos anyway don't expect to run anything
else from tripleo
17:41 < sshnaidm|rover> ~10 repos * N branches, will save us a little work..
17:41 < marios> sshnaidm|rover: ack ... if it is easy enough to have that
as special case then OK. and yes
having one job instead of 2 (one content provider) brings
its own benefits
>> Best regards,
>> Bogdan Dobrelya,
>> Irc #bogdando
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openstack-discuss