Uniting TC and UC
Mohamed Elsakhawy
m2elsakha at gmail.com
Thu May 28 13:46:42 UTC 2020
Thanks all.
Regarding the user-committee mailing list, we had a discussion and there's
no reason to keep it alive. So it can be merged once the UC/TC merger is
done.
Thanks, Thierry for adding it to the list. Do we have a specific order that
items will be discussed in the TC PTG sessions?
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 1:54 PM Jay S. Bryant <jungleboyj at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On 5/7/2020 11:00 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > Mohamed Elsakhawy wrote:
> >> As you may know already, there has been an ongoing discussion to
> >> merge UC and TC under a single body. Three options were presented,
> >> along with their impact on the bylaws.
> >>
> >>
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-February/012806.html
> >>
> >>
> >> We had several discussions in the UC on the three options as well as
> >> the UC items that need to be well-represented under the common
> >> committee, and here’s what we propose for the merger:
> >> [...]
> >
> > Thanks Mohamed for the detailed plan. With Jeremy's caveats, it sounds
> > good to me. I'm happy to assist by filing the necessary changes in the
> > various governance repositories.
> >
> >> [...]
> >> In addition to discussions over the mailing list, we also have the
> >> opportunity of "face-to-face" discussions at the upcoming PTG.
> >
> > I added this topic to the etherpad at:
> > https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/tc-victoria-ptg
> >
> I agree. Thanks Mohamed for putting this together. It is consistent
> with the plan we discussed earlier in the year.
>
> Thanks for adding it to the Etherpad ttx.
>
> Jay
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200528/0d406204/attachment.html>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list