[nova][ptg] Feature Liaison

Ghanshyam Mann gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Mon May 25 15:09:40 UTC 2020


 ---- On Mon, 25 May 2020 04:31:41 -0500 Sylvain Bauza <sbauza at redhat.com> wrote ----
 > 
 > 
 > On Mon, May 18, 2020 at 5:56 PM Balázs Gibizer <balazs.gibizer at est.tech> wrote:
 > Hi,
 > 
 > [This is a topic from the PTG etherpad [0]. As the PTG time is 
 > intentionally kept short, let's try to discuss it or even conclude it 
 > before the PTG]
 > 
 > Last cycle we introduced the Feature Liaison process [1]. I think this 
 > is time to reflect on it.
 > Did it helped?
 > Do we need to tweak it?
 > 
 > Personally for me it did not help much but I think this is a fairly low 
 > cost process so I'm OK to keep it as is.
 > 
 > 
 > Cool with me. Maybe we could just tell it's optional, so we could better see who would like to get some mentor for them.

+1 on optional and keep it for new contributors which can be any time in the future. So at least if anyone asks we can tell this is
how you can get some dedicated Core for your code review/help.

-gmann

 > -Sylvain
 > Cheers,
 > gibi
 > 
 > 
 > [0] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-victoria-ptg
 > [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685857/
 > 
 > 
 > 
 >



More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list