[nova][ptg] Feature Liaison

Stephen Finucane stephenfin at redhat.com
Fri May 22 20:15:23 UTC 2020


On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 17:50 +0200, Balázs Gibizer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> [This is a topic from the PTG etherpad [0]. As the PTG time is 
> intentionally kept short, let's try to discuss it or even conclude it 
> before the PTG]
> 
> Last cycle we introduced the Feature Liaison process [1]. I think this 
> is time to reflect on it.
> Did it helped?
> Do we need to tweak it?
> 
> Personally for me it did not help much but I think this is a fairly low 
> cost process so I'm OK to keep it as is.

I'm of much the same opinion. I don't think it achieved what it was
expected to achieve, and I suspect people reaching out to cores on IRC
effectively achieves the same purpose. It's low cost to keep this, at
you say, but personally I would still remove this section.

Stephen

> Cheers,
> gibi
> 
> 
> [0] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-victoria-ptg
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685857/
> 
> 
> 




More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list