[nova][ptg] Feature Liaison
Stephen Finucane
stephenfin at redhat.com
Fri May 22 20:15:23 UTC 2020
On Mon, 2020-05-18 at 17:50 +0200, Balázs Gibizer wrote:
> Hi,
>
> [This is a topic from the PTG etherpad [0]. As the PTG time is
> intentionally kept short, let's try to discuss it or even conclude it
> before the PTG]
>
> Last cycle we introduced the Feature Liaison process [1]. I think this
> is time to reflect on it.
> Did it helped?
> Do we need to tweak it?
>
> Personally for me it did not help much but I think this is a fairly low
> cost process so I'm OK to keep it as is.
I'm of much the same opinion. I don't think it achieved what it was
expected to achieve, and I suspect people reaching out to cores on IRC
effectively achieves the same purpose. It's low cost to keep this, at
you say, but personally I would still remove this section.
Stephen
> Cheers,
> gibi
>
>
> [0] https://etherpad.opendev.org/p/nova-victoria-ptg
> [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685857/
>
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list