Open Stack

On Tue, 2020-05-05 at 16:57 +0200, Marcin Juszkiewicz wrote:
> W dniu 05.05.2020 o 15:56, Bogdan Dobrelya pisze:
> > Let's for a minute imagine that each of the raised concerns is
> > addressable. And as a thought experiment, let's put here WHAT has to
> > be addressed for Kolla w/o the need of abandoning it for a custom
> > tooling:
> > > 1) input image (centos/ubi0/ubuntu/clear/whatever)
> > 
> > * support ubi8 base images
> 
> "kolla-build --base-image ubi8" has you covered. Or you can provide a
> patch which will switch to ubi8 for some of existing targets. Easy,
> really.
> 
> > > 2) Packaging method for the application (source/rpm/dpkg/magic)
> > 
> > * abstract away all the packaging methods (at least above the base
> > image) to some (better?) DSL perhaps
> 
> What is DSL? Digital Subscriber Line? Did Something Likeable? Droids
> Supporting Legacy?
domain specific language

there was a propsoal a few years ago before we started to use macros
and other features in jinja to create a DSL for kolla

uitlising jinja which is a DSL iteslf was seen as less of a learning curve
then creating a custom dsl for kolla.

the docker file format is also a DSL.
> 
> I decided to not follow rest of discussion. Let you guys invent
> something interesting and working. I can just follow then.
>