Open Stack

On Sun, Mar 29, 2020 at 10:37 PM Dmitry Tantsur <dtantsur at redhat.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 10:08 PM Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Find my comments on several repositories.
>>
>> On Sat, Mar 28, 2020 at 6:34 PM Thomas Goirand <zigo at debian.org> wrote:
>> >
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Sphinx 2.4 has been uploaded to Experimental. I just received bug
>> > reports against the OpenStack packages because some of them cannot be
>> > built with Sphinx 2.4. Here's the list:
>> >
>> > - ironic
>> > - os-api-ref
>>
>> I can build the document with sphinx 2.4.4.
>>
>> > - aodh
>> > - cloudkitty
>> > - kombu
>>
>> This is not part of OpenStack and is not found in opendev.org.
>>
>> > - panko
>> > - ceilometerclient
>> > - ceilometermiddleware
>> > - doc8
>>
>> doc8 was retired Jul 2019.
>
>
> For those like me who just nearly had a heart attack: it wasn't fully retired, it was moved (?) to https://github.com/PyCQA/doc8

Yeah, my first email was not enough and I sent a follow-up.
---
One correction on doc8.
The repository was retired, but more precisely, as mentioned at
https://opendev.org/x/doc8, it was moved to
https://github.com/PyCQA/doc8
---

>>
>>
>> > - dracclient
>> > - glareclient
>> > - murano-pkg-check
>> > - os-xenapi
>> > - scciclient
>> > - sahara
>> > - sphinxcontrib-programoutput
>>
>> This is not part of OpenStack and is not found in opendev.org.
>>
>> > - tempest-horizon
>>
>> sphinx document is not actually used and the content was not changed
>> under the initial cookiecutter commit.
>> I proposed a patch to drop sphinx related stuffs. Hope it works for you.
>>
>> >
>> > It'd be nice if those affected could be fixed for Ussuri. IMO, it's just
>> > the doc, so fixing it wouldn't hurt code quality. In other words: help
>> > would be more than welcome writing patch or reviewing them, and testing
>> > Sphinx 2.4 compatibility.
>> >
>> > Cheers,
>> >
>> > Thomas Goirand (zigo)
>> >
>>