[nova] feasibility to keep the two-company rule

Lee Yarwood lyarwood at redhat.com
Fri Mar 20 10:33:42 UTC 2020


On 19-03-20 18:23:50, Bal√°zs Gibizer wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Nova has an unwritten rule that requires to have at least two companies
> involved in any new feature development (or even bugfix?). In the current
> Nova core diversity situation this rule puts extra burden to the remaining
> non Red Hat cores and I guess it also makes any Red Hat driven feature
> development harder. In parallel to working on increasing the size of the
> core team I suggest to reconsider dropping this rule.
> 
> Some discussion happened already on the today's meeting[1].
> 
> Cheers,
> gibi
> 
> [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-03-19-16.00.log.html#l-90

Thanks again for raising this gibi!

+1 from me, while this topic has been discussed at length many times now
I agree that given the current core diversity situation we need to look
at this again. I would personally be happy to see the rule dropped for
the time being while in parallel we also try to increase the pool of
cores from outside of RH.

Cheers,

-- 
Lee Yarwood                 A5D1 9385 88CB 7E5F BE64  6618 BCA6 6E33 F672 2D76
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200320/0c4ff908/attachment.sig>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list