[nova] feasibility to keep the two-company rule

Lee Yarwood lyarwood at redhat.com
Fri Mar 20 10:33:42 UTC 2020

On 19-03-20 18:23:50, Bal√°zs Gibizer wrote:
> Hi,
> Nova has an unwritten rule that requires to have at least two companies
> involved in any new feature development (or even bugfix?). In the current
> Nova core diversity situation this rule puts extra burden to the remaining
> non Red Hat cores and I guess it also makes any Red Hat driven feature
> development harder. In parallel to working on increasing the size of the
> core team I suggest to reconsider dropping this rule.
> Some discussion happened already on the today's meeting[1].
> Cheers,
> gibi
> [1] http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/nova/2020/nova.2020-03-19-16.00.log.html#l-90

Thanks again for raising this gibi!

+1 from me, while this topic has been discussed at length many times now
I agree that given the current core diversity situation we need to look
at this again. I would personally be happy to see the rule dropped for
the time being while in parallel we also try to increase the pool of
cores from outside of RH.


Lee Yarwood                 A5D1 9385 88CB 7E5F BE64  6618 BCA6 6E33 F672 2D76
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 488 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200320/0c4ff908/attachment.sig>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list