[all][tc] Moving PTL role to "Maintainers"
Brian Rosmaita
rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com
Thu Mar 12 22:09:31 UTC 2020
On 3/12/20 10:37 AM, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> Thierry Carrez wrote:
>> [...]
>> So one solution might be:
>>
>> - Define multiple roles (release liaison, event liaison, meeting
>> chair...) and allow them to be filled by the team as they want, for
>> the duration they want, replaced when they want (would just need +1
>> from previous and new holder of the role)
>>
>> - Use the TC as a governance safety valve to resolve any conflict
>> (instead of PTL elections)
>
> Proposed as a strawman at: https://review.opendev.org/#/c/712696/
> Feel free to comment on how crazy that is there...
>
Maybe the proposal itself is crazy, maybe not, but the timing of this is
certainly crazy.
This is not a good time to be having this discussion. We're just about
to start week R-8. The final release for non-client libraries is at
R-6, the final release for client libraries and feature freeze is at
R-5. So there is (should be) a lot of stuff happening in the projects
right now, that may preclude people from being as active in this
discussion as they might wish. Plus, I don't know about y'all, but the
current pandemic is making simple day-to-day living more stressful on me
than it was a few weeks ago.
What I'm saying is that I'd appreciate clarification on the timeline for
this change. This is the kind of thing that could use discussion at the
PTG. If the point of Thierry's patch is to prepare for discussion at
the PTG, then that's great, I personally will revisit it at R-1, and be
ready to have a productive discussion. But I think this is not a good
time to make the usual "silence is assent" inference to a proposal
floated on the mailing list.
cheers,
brian
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list