[cyborg] Proposing core reviewers

Zhipeng Huang zhipengh512 at gmail.com
Wed Mar 11 16:17:59 UTC 2020

Big +1 for Brin and shogo's nomination and well deserved :)

I'm a little bit concerned over the 18 months period. The original rule we
setup is volunteer step down, since this is a small team we want to
acknowledge everyone that has made significant contributions. Some of the
inactive core reviewers like Justin Kilpatrick have moved on a long time
ago, and I don't see people like him could do any harm to the project.

But if the core reviewer has a size limit in the system, that would be
reasonable to replace the inactive ones with the new recruits :)

Just my two cents

On Wed, Mar 11, 2020 at 10:19 PM Nadathur, Sundar <sundar.nadathur at intel.com>

> Hello all,
>     Brin Zhang has been actively contributing to Cyborg in various areas,
> adding new features, improving quality, reviewing patches, and generally
> helping others in the community. Despite the relatively short time, he has
> been one of the most prolific contributors, and brings an enthusiastic and
> active mindset. I would like to thank him and acknowledge his significant
> contributions by proposing him as a core reviewer for Cyborg.
> Shogo Saito has been active in Cyborg since Train release. He has been
> driving the Cyborg client improvements, including its revamp to use
> OpenStackSDK. Previously he was instrumental in the transition to Python 3,
> testing and fixing issues in the process. As he has access to real FPGA
> hardware, he brings a usersā€™ perspective and also tests Cyborg with real
> hardware. I would like to thank and acknowledge him for his steady valuable
> contributions, and propose him as a core reviewer for Cyborg.
> Some of the currently listed core reviewers have not been participating
> for a lengthy period of time. It is proposed that those who have had no
> contributions for the past 18 months ā€“ i.e. no participation in meetings,
> no code contributions and no reviews ā€“ be removed from the list of core
> reviewers.
> If no objections are made known by March 20, I will make the changes
> proposed above.
> Thanks.
> Regards,
> Sundar

Zhipeng (Howard) Huang

Principle Engineer
OpenStack, Kubernetes, CNCF, LF Edge, ONNX, Kubeflow, OpenSDS, Open Service
Broker API, OCP, Hyperledger, ETSI, SNIA, DMTF, W3C
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200312/c5c99998/attachment.html>

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list