Open Stack

On 3/6/20 6:12 PM, Goutham Pacha Ravi wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 11:53 AM Brian Rosmaita 
> <rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com <mailto:rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com>> wrote:
> 
>     On 3/4/20 5:40 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
>      >   ---- On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:53:00 -0600 Brian Rosmaita
>     <rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com <mailto:rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com>>
>     wrote ----
>      >   > Hello QA team and devstack-plugin-ceph-core people,
>      >   >
>      >   > The Cinder team has some proposals we'd like to float.
>      >   >
>      >   > 1. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the
>      >   > maintenance of openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph [0]. 
>     Currently, the
>      >   > devstack-plugin-ceph-core is
>      >   > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1196,members
>      >   > The cinder-core is already represented by Eric and Sean; we'd
>     like to
>      >   > replace them by including the cinder-core group.
>      >
>      > +1. This is good diea and make sense, I will do the change.
> 
>     Great, thanks!
> 
> 
> 
> I agree this is a great idea to have more members of Cinder joining the 
> devstack-plugin-ceph team. I would like to have atleast a sub team of 
> manila core reviewers added to this project if it makes sense. The 
> Manila CephFS drivers (cephfs-native and cephfs-nfs) are currently being 
> tested with the help of the devstack integration in devstack-plugin-ceph.
> 
> We have Tom Barron (tbarron) in the team, i'd like to propose myself 
> (gouthamr) and Victoria Martinez de la Cruz (vkmc)
> 
> Please let me know what you think of the idea.

I've got no objection from the Cinder side.  I would also not object to 
adding the manila-core group instead of individuals.  It's certainly in 
your team's interest to keep this thing stable and working, just as it 
is for the Cinder team.

> 
>      >   >
>      >   > 2. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the
>      >   > maintenance of x/devstack-plugin-nfs [1].  Currently, the
>      >   > devstack-plugin-nfs-core is
>      >   > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1330,members
>      >   > It's already 75% cinder-core members; we'd like to replace the
>      >   > individual members with the cinder-core group.  We also
>     propose that
>      >   > devstack-core be added as an included group.
>      >   >
>      >   > 3. The Cinder team is interested in implementing a new
>     devstack plugin:
>      >   >      openstack/devstack-plugin-open-cas
>      >   > This will enable thorough testing of a new feature [2] being
>     introduced
>      >   > as experimental in Ussuri and expected to be finalized in
>     Victoria.  Our
>      >   > plan would be to make both cinder-core and devstack-core
>     included groups
>      >   > for the gerrit group governing the new plugin.
>      >
>      > +1. You want this under Cinder governance or under QA ?
> 
>     I think it makes sense for these to be under QA governance -- QA would
>     own the repo with both QA and Cinder having permission to make changes.
> 
>      >   >
>      >   > 4. This is a minor point, but can the devstack-plugin-nfs
>     repo be moved
>      >   > back into the 'openstack' namespace?
>      >
>      > If this is usable plugin for nfs testing (I am not aware if we
>     have any other) then
>      > it make sense to bring it to openstack governance.
>      > Same question here, do you want to put this under Cinder
>     governance or QA.
> 
>     Same here, I think QA should "own" the repo, but Cinder will have
>     permission to make changes there.
> 
>      >
>      > Those plugins under QA governance also ok for me with your
>     proposal of calloborative maintainance by
>      > devstack-core and cinder-core.
>      >
>      > -gmann
> 
>     Thanks for the quick response!
> 
>      >   >
>      >   > Let us know which of these proposals you find acceptable.
>      >   >
>      >   >
>      >   > [0] https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph
>      >   > [1] https://opendev.org/x/devstack-plugin-nfs
>      >   > [2]
>     https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/support-volume-local-cache
>      >   >
>      >   >
>      >
> 
>