Open Stack

 ---- On Thu, 05 Mar 2020 13:49:11 -0600 Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com> wrote ----
 > On 3/4/20 5:40 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
 > >   ---- On Wed, 04 Mar 2020 13:53:00 -0600 Brian Rosmaita <rosmaita.fossdev at gmail.com> wrote ----
 > >   > Hello QA team and devstack-plugin-ceph-core people,
 > >   >
 > >   > The Cinder team has some proposals we'd like to float.
 > >   >
 > >   > 1. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the
 > >   > maintenance of openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph [0].  Currently, the
 > >   > devstack-plugin-ceph-core is
 > >   > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1196,members
 > >   > The cinder-core is already represented by Eric and Sean; we'd like to
 > >   > replace them by including the cinder-core group.
 > > 
 > > +1. This is good diea and make sense, I will do the change.
 > 
 > Great, thanks!

Done.

 > 
 > >   >
 > >   > 2. The Cinder team is interested in becoming more active in the
 > >   > maintenance of x/devstack-plugin-nfs [1].  Currently, the
 > >   > devstack-plugin-nfs-core is
 > >   > https://review.opendev.org/#/admin/groups/1330,members
 > >   > It's already 75% cinder-core members; we'd like to replace the
 > >   > individual members with the cinder-core group.  We also propose that
 > >   > devstack-core be added as an included group.
 > >   >
 > >   > 3. The Cinder team is interested in implementing a new devstack plugin:
 > >   >      openstack/devstack-plugin-open-cas
 > >   > This will enable thorough testing of a new feature [2] being introduced
 > >   > as experimental in Ussuri and expected to be finalized in Victoria.  Our
 > >   > plan would be to make both cinder-core and devstack-core included groups
 > >   > for the gerrit group governing the new plugin.
 > > 
 > > +1. You want this under Cinder governance or under QA ?
 > 
 > I think it makes sense for these to be under QA governance -- QA would 
 > own the repo with both QA and Cinder having permission to make changes.

Sure. Please let me know once it is ready or propose it under QA and I will review that.

 > 
 > >   >
 > >   > 4. This is a minor point, but can the devstack-plugin-nfs repo be moved
 > >   > back into the 'openstack' namespace?
 > > 
 > > If this is usable plugin for nfs testing (I am not aware if we have any other) then
 > > it make sense to bring it to openstack governance.
 > > Same question here, do you want to put this under Cinder governance or QA.
 > 
 > Same here, I think QA should "own" the repo, but Cinder will have 
 > permission to make changes there.

Sounds good. I proposed the patches: https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:devstack-plugin-nfs+(status:open+OR+status:merged)

-gmann

 > 
 > > 
 > > Those plugins under QA governance also ok for me with your proposal of calloborative maintainance by
 > > devstack-core and cinder-core.
 > > 
 > > -gmann
 > 
 > Thanks for the quick response!
 > 
 > >   >
 > >   > Let us know which of these proposals you find acceptable.
 > >   >
 > >   >
 > >   > [0] https://opendev.org/openstack/devstack-plugin-ceph
 > >   > [1] https://opendev.org/x/devstack-plugin-nfs
 > >   > [2] https://blueprints.launchpad.net/cinder/+spec/support-volume-local-cache
 > >   >
 > >   >
 > > 
 > 
 > 
 >