Open Stack

+1 to put these in the Operations Docs SIG

On Wed, Jul 29, 2020 at 12:25 AM Fabian Zimmermann <dev.faz at gmail.com>
wrote:

> +1
>
> Laurent Dumont <laurentfdumont at gmail.com> schrieb am Mi., 29. Juli 2020,
> 04:00:
>
>> Interested in this as well. We use Openstack a $Dayjob :)
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 2:52 PM Amy Marrich <amy at demarco.com> wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on combining this in with the existing SiG and efforts.
>>>
>>> Amy (spotz)
>>>
>>> On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:02 PM Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> >> If Osops should be considered distinct from OpenStack
>>>> >
>>>> > That feels like the wrong statement to make, even if only implicitly
>>>> > by repo organization. Is there a compelling reason not to have osops
>>>> > under the openstack namespace?
>>>> >
>>>> I think it makes the most sense to be under the openstack namespace.
>>>>
>>>> We have the Operations Docs SIG right now that took on some of the
>>>> operator-specific documentation that no longer had a home. This was a
>>>> consistent issue brought up in the Ops Meetup events. While not "wildly
>>>> successful" in getting a bunch of new and updated docs, it at least has
>>>> accomplished the main goal of getting these docs published to
>>>> docs.openstack.org again, and providing a place where more
>>>> collaboration
>>>> can (and occasionally does) happen to improve those docs.
>>>>
>>>> I think we could probably expand the scope of this SIG. Especially
>>>> considering it is a pretty low-volume SIG anyway. I would be good with
>>>> changing this to something like the "Operator Docs and Tooling SIG" and
>>>> getting any of these useful tooling repos under governance through that.
>>>> I personally wouldn't be able to spend a lot of time working on anything
>>>> under the SIG, but I'd be happy to keep an eye out for any new reviews
>>>> and help get those through.
>>>>
>>>> Sean
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>

-- 
Chris Morgan <mihalis68 at gmail.com>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200730/21901bc7/attachment.html>