Open Stack

Hello again,

What's the proper way to handle dynamic pollsters in gnocchi ?
Right now ceilometer returns:

WARNING ceilometer.publisher.gnocchi [-] metric dynamic.network.octavia is
not handled by Gnocchi

I found
https://docs.openstack.org/ceilometer/latest/contributor/new_resource_types.html
but I'm not sure if is the right direction.

On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 10:52 AM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:

> Seems to work fine now. Thanks.
>
> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 8:12 PM Rafael Weingärtner <
> rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> It looks like a coding error that we left behind during a major
>> refactoring that we introduced upstream.
>> I created a patch for it. Can you check/review and test it?
>> https://review.opendev.org/739555
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:17 AM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>
>>> I have an error and I cannot resolve it myself.
>>>
>>> https://paste.xinu.at/LEfdXD/
>>>
>>> Do you happen to know what's wrong?
>>>
>>> endpoint list https://paste.xinu.at/v3j1jl/
>>> octavia.yaml https://paste.xinu.at/TIxfOz/
>>> polling.yaml https://paste.xinu.at/oBEFj/
>>> pipeline.yaml https://paste.xinu.at/qvEdTX/
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:10 AM Rafael Weingärtner <
>>> rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Good catch. I fixed the docs.
>>>> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739288/
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 1:59 PM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I just noticed that the example
>>>>> dynamic.network.services.vpn.connection from
>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/ceilometer/latest/admin/telemetry-dynamic-pollster.html has
>>>>> the wrong indentation.
>>>>> This https://paste.xinu.at/6PTfsM/ is loaded without any error.
>>>>>
>>>>> Now I have to see why is not polling from it
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 7:19 PM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think I applied all the reviews successfully but I tried to do an
>>>>>> octavia dynamic poller but I have couples of errors.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Here is the octavia.yaml: https://paste.xinu.at/kDN6SV/
>>>>>> Error is about syntax error near name: https://paste.xinu.at/MHgDBY/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> if i remove the - in front of name like this:
>>>>>> https://paste.xinu.at/K7s5I8/
>>>>>> The error is different this time: https://paste.xinu.at/zWdC0U/
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Is there something I missed or is something wrong  in yaml?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 5:50 PM Rafael Weingärtner <
>>>>>> rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Since the merging window for ussuri was long passed for those
>>>>>>>> commits, is it safe to assume that it will not land in stable/ussuri at all
>>>>>>>> and those will be available for victoria?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I would say so. We are lacking people to review and then merge it.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> How safe is to cherry pick those commits and use them in production?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> As long as the person executing the cherry-picks, and maintaining
>>>>>>> the code knows what she/he is doing, you should be safe. The guys that are
>>>>>>> using this implementation (and others that I and my colleagues proposed),
>>>>>>> have a few openstack components that are customized with the
>>>>>>> patches/enhancements/extensions we developed so far; this means, they are
>>>>>>> not using the community version, but something in-between (the community
>>>>>>> releases + the patches we did). Of course, it is only possible, because we
>>>>>>> are the ones creating and maintaining these codes; therefore, we can assure
>>>>>>> quality for production.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:43 AM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Hello Rafael,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Since the merging window for ussuri was long passed for those
>>>>>>>> commits, is it safe to assume that it will not land in stable/ussuri at all
>>>>>>>> and those will be available for victoria?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> How safe is to cherry pick those commits and use them in production?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 3:06 PM Rafael Weingärtner <
>>>>>>>> rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The dynamic pollster in Ceilometer will be first released in
>>>>>>>>> Ussuri. However, there are some important PRs still waiting for a merge,
>>>>>>>>> that might be important for your use case:
>>>>>>>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/722092/
>>>>>>>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715180/
>>>>>>>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715289/
>>>>>>>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679999/
>>>>>>>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709807/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:18 AM Carlos Goncalves <
>>>>>>>>> cgoncalves at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:20 PM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I want to meter the loadbalancer into gnocchi for billing
>>>>>>>>>>> purposes in stein/train and ceilometer doesn't support dynamic pollsters.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I think I misunderstood your use case, sorry. I read it as if you
>>>>>>>>>> wanted to know "if a loadbalancer was deployed and has status active".
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Until I upgrade to Ussuri, is there a way to accomplish this?
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm not sure Ceilometer supports it even in Ussuri. I'll defer to
>>>>>>>>>> the Ceilometer project.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:45 PM Carlos Goncalves <
>>>>>>>>>>> cgoncalves at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ionut,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:27 AM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was trying to add in polling.yaml and pipeline from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> ceilometer the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>    - network.services.lb.active.connections
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.health_monitor
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.incoming.bytes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.listener
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.loadbalancer
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.member
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.outgoing.bytes
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.pool
>>>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.total.connections
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> But it doesn't work, I think they are for the old lbs that
>>>>>>>>>>>>> were supported in neutron.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I found
>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/ceilometer/latest/admin/telemetry-dynamic-pollster.html
>>>>>>>>>>>>> but this is not available in stein or train.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a way to meter loadbalancers from
>>>>>>>>>>>>> octavia.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I mostly want for start to just meter if a loadbalancer was
>>>>>>>>>>>>> deployed and has status active.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> You can get the provisioning and operating status of Octavia
>>>>>>>>>>>> load balancers via the Octavia API. There is also an API endpoint that
>>>>>>>>>>>> returns the full load balancer status tree [1]. Additionally, Octavia
>>>>>>>>>>>> has three API endpoints for statistics [2][3][4].
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I hope this helps with your use case.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=get-the-load-balancer-status-tree-detail#get-the-load-balancer-status-tree
>>>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=get-load-balancer-statistics-detail#get-load-balancer-statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=get-listener-statistics-detail#get-listener-statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=show-amphora-statistics-detail#show-amphora-statistics
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>
>
>
> --
> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>


-- 
Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200707/778b0c49/attachment-0001.html>