Open Stack

It looks like a coding error that we left behind during a major refactoring
that we introduced upstream.
I created a patch for it. Can you check/review and test it?
https://review.opendev.org/739555

On Mon, Jul 6, 2020 at 11:17 AM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:

> Hi Rafael,
>
> I have an error and I cannot resolve it myself.
>
> https://paste.xinu.at/LEfdXD/
>
> Do you happen to know what's wrong?
>
> endpoint list https://paste.xinu.at/v3j1jl/
> octavia.yaml https://paste.xinu.at/TIxfOz/
> polling.yaml https://paste.xinu.at/oBEFj/
> pipeline.yaml https://paste.xinu.at/qvEdTX/
>
>
> On Sat, Jul 4, 2020 at 1:10 AM Rafael Weingärtner <
> rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Good catch. I fixed the docs.
>> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/739288/
>>
>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 1:59 PM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I just noticed that the example dynamic.network.services.vpn.connection
>>> from
>>> https://docs.openstack.org/ceilometer/latest/admin/telemetry-dynamic-pollster.html has
>>> the wrong indentation.
>>> This https://paste.xinu.at/6PTfsM/ is loaded without any error.
>>>
>>> Now I have to see why is not polling from it
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 3, 2020 at 7:19 PM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi Rafael,
>>>>
>>>> I think I applied all the reviews successfully but I tried to do an
>>>> octavia dynamic poller but I have couples of errors.
>>>>
>>>> Here is the octavia.yaml: https://paste.xinu.at/kDN6SV/
>>>> Error is about syntax error near name: https://paste.xinu.at/MHgDBY/
>>>>
>>>> if i remove the - in front of name like this:
>>>> https://paste.xinu.at/K7s5I8/
>>>> The error is different this time: https://paste.xinu.at/zWdC0U/
>>>>
>>>> Is there something I missed or is something wrong  in yaml?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 5:50 PM Rafael Weingärtner <
>>>> rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Since the merging window for ussuri was long passed for those commits,
>>>>>> is it safe to assume that it will not land in stable/ussuri at all and
>>>>>> those will be available for victoria?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I would say so. We are lacking people to review and then merge it.
>>>>>
>>>>> How safe is to cherry pick those commits and use them in production?
>>>>>>
>>>>> As long as the person executing the cherry-picks, and maintaining the
>>>>> code knows what she/he is doing, you should be safe. The guys that are
>>>>> using this implementation (and others that I and my colleagues proposed),
>>>>> have a few openstack components that are customized with the
>>>>> patches/enhancements/extensions we developed so far; this means, they are
>>>>> not using the community version, but something in-between (the community
>>>>> releases + the patches we did). Of course, it is only possible, because we
>>>>> are the ones creating and maintaining these codes; therefore, we can assure
>>>>> quality for production.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Jul 2, 2020 at 9:43 AM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hello Rafael,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Since the merging window for ussuri was long passed for those
>>>>>> commits, is it safe to assume that it will not land in stable/ussuri at all
>>>>>> and those will be available for victoria?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> How safe is to cherry pick those commits and use them in production?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 3:06 PM Rafael Weingärtner <
>>>>>> rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The dynamic pollster in Ceilometer will be first released in Ussuri.
>>>>>>> However, there are some important PRs still waiting for a merge, that might
>>>>>>> be important for your use case:
>>>>>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/722092/
>>>>>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715180/
>>>>>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/715289/
>>>>>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/679999/
>>>>>>> * https://review.opendev.org/#/c/709807/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 8:18 AM Carlos Goncalves <
>>>>>>> cgoncalves at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:20 PM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I want to meter the loadbalancer into gnocchi for billing purposes
>>>>>>>>> in stein/train and ceilometer doesn't support dynamic pollsters.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think I misunderstood your use case, sorry. I read it as if you
>>>>>>>> wanted to know "if a loadbalancer was deployed and has status active".
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Until I upgrade to Ussuri, is there a way to accomplish this?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I'm not sure Ceilometer supports it even in Ussuri. I'll defer to
>>>>>>>> the Ceilometer project.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 12:45 PM Carlos Goncalves <
>>>>>>>>> cgoncalves at redhat.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Hi Ionut,
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Fri, Apr 24, 2020 at 11:27 AM Ionut Biru <ionut at fleio.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Hello guys,
>>>>>>>>>>> I was trying to add in polling.yaml and pipeline from ceilometer
>>>>>>>>>>> the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>    - network.services.lb.active.connections
>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.health_monitor
>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.incoming.bytes
>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.listener
>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.loadbalancer
>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.member
>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.outgoing.bytes
>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.pool
>>>>>>>>>>>       - network.services.lb.total.connections
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> But it doesn't work, I think they are for the old lbs that were
>>>>>>>>>>> supported in neutron.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I found
>>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/ceilometer/latest/admin/telemetry-dynamic-pollster.html
>>>>>>>>>>> but this is not available in stein or train.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I was wondering if there is a way to meter loadbalancers from
>>>>>>>>>>> octavia.
>>>>>>>>>>> I mostly want for start to just meter if a loadbalancer was
>>>>>>>>>>> deployed and has status active.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can get the provisioning and operating status of Octavia load
>>>>>>>>>> balancers via the Octavia API. There is also an API endpoint that returns
>>>>>>>>>> the full load balancer status tree [1]. Additionally, Octavia
>>>>>>>>>> has three API endpoints for statistics [2][3][4].
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I hope this helps with your use case.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>>>>> Carlos
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [1]
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=get-the-load-balancer-status-tree-detail#get-the-load-balancer-status-tree
>>>>>>>>>> [2]
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=get-load-balancer-statistics-detail#get-load-balancer-statistics
>>>>>>>>>> [3]
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=get-listener-statistics-detail#get-listener-statistics
>>>>>>>>>> [4]
>>>>>>>>>> https://docs.openstack.org/api-ref/load-balancer/v2/?expanded=show-amphora-statistics-detail#show-amphora-statistics
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>
>
>
> --
> Ionut Biru - https://fleio.com
>


-- 
Rafael Weingärtner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200706/54328f8d/attachment-0001.html>