On 7/1/20 2:24 PM, Hongbin Lu wrote: > Hi all, > > A short question. I saw a few projects are using the name 'ca_file' > [1] as config option, while others are using 'cafile' [2]. I wonder > what is the flavorite name convention? > > I asked this question because Kolla developer suggested Zun to rename > from 'ca_file' to 'cafile' to avoid the confusion [3]. I want to > confirm if this is a good idea from Keystone's perspective. Thanks. > > Best regards, > Hongbin > > [1] > http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=cfg.StrOpt%5C(%27ca_file%27&i=nope&files=&repos= > [2] > http://codesearch.openstack.org/?q=cfg.StrOpt%5C(%27cafile%27&i=nope&files=&repos= > [3] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/738329/ Cinder and Glance both use ca_file (and ssl_ca_file and vmware_ca_file, and registry_client_ca_file). From keystone_auth, we do also have cafile. Personally, I find the separation of ca_file to be much easier to read. Sean