[all][tc][uc] Uniting the TC and the UC
Ghanshyam Mann
gmann at ghanshyammann.com
Wed Feb 26 02:29:59 UTC 2020
---- On Tue, 25 Feb 2020 19:39:36 -0600 Zane Bitter <zbitter at redhat.com> wrote ----
> On 25/02/20 5:23 am, Thierry Carrez wrote:
> > 1- No bylaws change
> > As bylaws changes take a lot of time and energy, the simplest approach
> > would be to merge the TC and UC without changing the bylaws at all. The
> > single body (called TC) would incorporate the AUC criteria by adding all
> > AUC members as extra-ATC. It would tackle all aspects of our community.
> > To respect the letter of the bylaws, the TC would formally designate 5
> > of its members to be the 'UC' and those would select a 'UC chair'. But
> > all tasks would be handled together.
>
> I think there's an even simpler approach. Any member of the foundation
> can nominate themselves as a UC member. In the past we've just kept
> extending the deadline until someone steps up. So the *simplest* thing
> to do is:
>
> * Run the election process as usual. If any users want to step up they
> are welcome to, and on past performance very likely to be acclaimed
> without an election.
> * If the deadline passes, the TC commits to finding enough warm bodies
> who are foundation members to fill any remaining seats, including from
> among its own members if necessary.
TC or BoDs ? If TC then we still need Bylaw change to remove the number
of UC and mention, TC owns to make UC team even with one or more members.
Because the number of 5 UC in Bylaw is something that has to be fixed.
But again the main question is how TC will find the members as nobody even from TC
are not running for UC.
-gmann
> * The additional volunteers are acclaimed, and all members of the UC
> elect a chair.
> * We accept that to the extent that the UC has duties to perform and
> ambassadors to help, this will largely remain un-done.
>
> This eliminates the issue of actual users needing to submit themselves
> to an election of all ATCs + AUCs in order to get a seat (which tbh
> seems questionable under the bylaws, since not all ATCs are AUCs).
>
> - ZB
>
>
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list