[CINDER] Distributed storage alternatives
Alfredo De Luca
alfredo.deluca at gmail.com
Tue Feb 18 11:36:50 UTC 2020
Thanks Burak and Ignazio.
On Thu, Feb 13, 2020 at 10:19 PM Burak Hoban <Burak.Hoban at iag.com.au> wrote:
> Hi guys,
> We use Dell EMC VxFlex OS, which in its current version allows for free
> use and commercial (in version 3.5 a licence is needed, but its perpetual).
> It's similar to Ceph but more geared towards scale and performance etc (it
> use to be called ScaleIO).
> Other than that, I know of a couple sites using SAN storage, but a lot of
> people just seem to use Ceph.
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 18:20:29 +0100
> From: Ignazio Cassano <ignaziocassano at gmail.com>
> To: Alfredo De Luca <alfredo.deluca at gmail.com>
> Cc: openstack-discuss <openstack-discuss at lists.openstack.org>
> Subject: Re: [CINDER] Distributed storage alternatives
> CAB7j8cXLQWh5fx-E9AveUEa6OncDwCL6BOGc-Pm2TX4FKwnUKg at mail.gmail.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
> Hello Alfredo, I think best opensource solution is ceph.
> As far as commercial solutions are concerned we are working with network
> appliance (netapp) and emc unity.
> Il Gio 13 Feb 2020, 13:48 Alfredo De Luca <alfredo.deluca at gmail.com> ha
> > Hi all.
> > we 'd like to explore storage back end alternatives to CEPH for
> > Openstack
> > I am aware of GlusterFS but what would you recommend for distributed
> > storage like Ceph and specifically for block device provisioning?
> > Of course must be:
> > 1. *Reliable*
> > 2. *Fast*
> > 3. *Capable of good performance over WAN given a good network back
> > end*
> > Both open source and commercial technologies and ideas are welcome.
> > Cheers
> > --
> > *Alfredo*
> The information transmitted in this message and its attachments (if any)
> is intended
> only for the person or entity to which it is addressed.
> The message may contain confidential and/or privileged material. Any
> retransmission, dissemination or other use of, or taking of any action in
> upon this information, by persons or entities other than the intended
> recipient is
> If you have received this in error, please contact the sender and delete
> this e-mail
> and associated material from any computer.
> The intended recipient of this e-mail may only use, reproduce, disclose or
> the information contained in this e-mail and any attached files, with the
> of the sender.
> This message has been scanned for viruses.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openstack-discuss