Open Stack

Sounds like we can keep the tradition going!

But seriously, I'm disappointed that I haven't been able to help look at
this at all, since I've had a major priority shift since the summit when I
volunteered to help. Such is the way of sponsored Openstack development, I
guess. I should be able to attend another meeting in Vancouver if you do
schedule one.

    --Adam

On Tue, Feb 11, 2020, 00:41 Artem Goncharov <artem.goncharov at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi,
>
> I am thinking to submit (not found possibility so far) a forum-like
> session for that again in Vancouver, where I would present current status
> of implementation and we can plan further steps.
> Unfortunately I have still no confirmation from my employer, that I will
> be allowed to go.
>
> Any ideas/objections?
>
> Regards,
> Artem
>
>
> On 3. Nov 2019, at 02:34, Tobias Rydberg <tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.eu>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Sounds really good Artem! Will you be at the session at the Summit? If
> not, I will bring the information from you to the session...
>
> Cheers,
> Tobias
>
> Tobias Rydberg
> Senior Developer
> Twitter & IRC: tobberydberg
> www.citynetwork.eu | www.citycloud.com
>
> INNOVATION THROUGH OPEN IT INFRASTRUCTURE
> ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 CERTIFIED
>
> On 2019-11-02 16:26, Artem Goncharov wrote:
>
> Hi Tobby,
>
> As I mentioned, if Monty does not start work, I will start it in few weeks
> latest (mid November). I need this now in my project, therefore I will be
> definitely able to spend time on implementation in both SDK and OSC.
>
> P.S. mailing this to you, since I will not be on the Summit.
>
> Regards,
> Artem
>
> On 2. Nov 2019, at 09:19, Tobias Rydberg <tobias.rydberg at citynetwork.eu>
> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> A Forum session is planned for this topic, Monday 11:40. Suites perfect to
> continue the discussions there as well.
>
>
> https://www.openstack.org/summit/shanghai-2019/summit-schedule/events/24407/project-resource-cleanup-followup
>
> BR,
> Tobias
>
> Tobias Rydberg
> Senior Developer
> Twitter & IRC: tobberydberg
> www.citynetwork.eu | www.citycloud.com
>
> INNOVATION THROUGH OPEN IT INFRASTRUCTURE
> ISO 9001, 14001, 27001, 27015 & 27018 CERTIFIED
>
> On 2019-10-30 15:43, Artem Goncharov wrote:
>
> Hi Adam,
>
> Since I need this now as well I will start working on implementation how
> it was agreed (in SDK and in OSC) during last summit by mid of November.
> There is no need for discussing this further, it just need to be
> implemented. Sad that we got no progress in half a year.
>
> Regards,
> Artem (gtema).
>
> On 30. Oct 2019, at 14:26, Adam Harwell <flux.adam at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That's too bad that you won't be at the summit, but I think there may
> still be some discussion planned about this topic.
>
> Yeah, I understand completely about priorities and such internally. Same
> for me... It just happens that this IS priority work for us right now. :)
>
>
> On Tue, Oct 29, 2019, 07:48 Adrian Turjak <adriant at catalyst.net.nz> wrote:
>
>> My apologies I missed this email.
>>
>> Sadly I won't be at the summit this time around. There may be some public
>> cloud focused discussions, and some of those often have this topic come up.
>> Also if Monty from the SDK team is around, I'd suggest finding him and
>> having a chat.
>>
>> I'll help if I can but we are swamped with internal work and I can't
>> dedicate much time to do upstream work that isn't urgent. :(
>> On 17/10/19 8:48 am, Adam Harwell wrote:
>>
>> That's interesting -- we have already started working to add features and
>> improve ospurge, and it seems like a plenty useful tool for our needs, but
>> I think I agree that it would be nice to have that functionality built into
>> the sdk. I might be able to help with both, since one is immediately useful
>> and we (like everyone) have deadlines to meet, and the other makes sense to
>> me as a possible future direction that could be more widely supported.
>>
>> Will you or someone else be hosting and discussion about this at the
>> Shanghai summit? I'll be there and would be happy to join and discuss.
>>
>>     --Adam
>>
>> On Tue, Oct 15, 2019, 22:04 Adrian Turjak <adriant at catalyst.net.nz>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> I tried to get a community goal to do project deletion per project, but
>>> we ended up deciding that a community goal wasn't ideal unless we did
>>> build a bulk delete API in each service:
>>> https://review.opendev.org/#/c/639010/
>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/community-goal-project-deletion
>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DEN-Deletion-of-resources
>>> https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/DEN-Train-PublicCloudWG-brainstorming
>>>
>>> What we decided on, but didn't get a chance to work on, was building
>>> into the OpenstackSDK OS-purge like functionality, as well as reporting
>>> functionality (of all project resources to be deleted). That way we
>>> could have per project per resource deletion logic, and all of that
>>> defined in the SDK.
>>>
>>> I was up for doing some of the work, but ended up swamped with internal
>>> work and just didn't drive or push for the deletion work upstream.
>>>
>>> If you want to do something useful, don't pursue OS-Purge, help us add
>>> that official functionality to the SDK, and then we can push for bulk
>>> deletion APIs in each project to make resource deletion more pleasant.
>>>
>>> I'd be happy to help with the work, and Monty on the SDK team will most
>>> likely be happy to as well. :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> Adrian
>>>
>>> On 1/10/19 11:48 am, Adam Harwell wrote:
>>> > I haven't seen much activity on this project in a while, and it's been
>>> > moved to opendev/x since the opendev migration... Who is the current
>>> > owner of this project? Is there anyone who actually is maintaining it,
>>> > or would mind if others wanted to adopt the project to move it forward?
>>> >
>>> > Thanks,
>>> >    --Adam Harwell
>>>
>>
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200211/0c94e638/attachment-0001.html>