Open Stack

Late to the party, but still: what's the proposed goal of the ironic
integration squad?

On Wed, Feb 5, 2020 at 6:00 PM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:

> Is there a need for Ironic integration one?
>
>
>
> *From:* Alan Bishop <abishop at redhat.com>
> *Sent:* Tuesday, February 4, 2020 2:20 PM
> *To:* Francesco Pantano
> *Cc:* John Fulton; Wesley Hayutin; OpenStack Discuss; Phil Weeks
> *Subject:* Re: [tripleo] rework of triple squads and the tripleo mtg.
>
>
>
> [EXTERNAL EMAIL]
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:22 AM Francesco Pantano <fpantano at redhat.com>
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 5:45 PM John Fulton <johfulto at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2020 at 11:13 AM Wesley Hayutin <whayutin at redhat.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > Greetings,
> >
> > As mentioned at the previous tripleo meeting [1], we're going to revisit
> the current tripleo squads and the expectations for those squads at the
> tripleo meeting.
> >
> > Currently we have the following squads..
> > 1. upgrades
> > 2. edge
> > 3. integration
> > 4. validations
> > 5. networking
> > 6. transformation
> > 7. ci
> >
> > A reasonable update could include the following..
> >
> > 1. validations
> > 2. transformation
> > 3. mistral-to-ansible
> > 4. CI
> > 5. Ceph / Integration?? maybe just Ceph?
>
> I'm fine with "Ceph". The original intent of going from "Ceph
> Integration" to the more generic "Integration" was that it could
> include anyone using external-deploy-steps to deploy non-openstack
> projects with TripleO (k8s, skydive, etc). Though those things
> happened, we didn't really get anyone else to join the squad or update
> our etherpad so I'm fine with renaming it to Ceph. We're still active
> but our etherpad was getting old. I updated it just now.
>
>
> Gulio? Francesco? Alan?
>
>
> Agree here and I also updated the etherpad as well [1] w/
> our current status and the open topics we still have on
> ceph side.
> Not sure if we want to use "Integration" since the topics
> couldn't be only ceph related but can involve other storage
> components.
>
> Giulio, Alan, wdyt?
>
>
>
> "Ceph integration" makes the most sense to me, but I'm fine with just
> naming it "Ceph" as we all know what that means.
>
>
>
> Alan
>
>
>
>
>
>
>   John
>
> > 6. others??
> >
> > The squads should reflect major current efforts by the TripleO team IMHO.
> >
> > For the meetings, I would propose we use this time and space to give
> context to current reviews in progress and solicit feedback.  It's also a
> good time and space to discuss any upstream blockers for those reviews.
> >
> > Let's give this one week for comments etc..  Next week we'll update the
> etherpad list and squads.  The etherpad list will be a decent way to
> communicate which reviews need attention.
> >
> > Thanks all!!!
> >
> > [1]
> http://eavesdrop.openstack.org/meetings/tripleo/2020/tripleo.2020-01-07-14.00.log.html
> >
> >
>
> [1] https://etherpad.openstack.org/p/tripleo-integration-squad-status
>
>
>
> --
>
> Francesco Pantano
> GPG KEY: F41BD75C
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200211/6dfc0aaa/attachment.html>