[barbican][oslo][nova][glance][cinder] cursive library status
Ben Nemec
openstack at nemebean.com
Wed Dec 16 18:50:15 UTC 2020
On 12/16/20 12:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> Hello Barbican team,
>
> Apologies for not including barbican in the previous thread on this topic:
>
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430.html
>
>
> The situation is that cursive is used by Nova, Glance, and Cinder and
> we'd like to move it out of the 'x' namespace into openstack governance.
> The question is then what team would oversee it. It seems like a good
> fit for Oslo, and the Oslo team seems OK with that, but since
> barbican-core is currently included in cursive-core, it make sense to
> give the Barbican team first dibs.
>
> From the consuming teams' side, I don't think we have a preference as
> long as it's clear who we need to bother about approvals if a bugfix is
> posted for review.
>
> Thus my ask is that the Barbican team indicate whether they'd like to
> move cursive to the 'openstack' namespace under their governance, or
> whether they'd prefer Oslo to oversee the library.
Note that this is not necessarily an either/or thing. Castellan is under
Oslo governance but is co-owned by the Oslo and Barbican teams. We could
do a similar thing with Cursive.
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list