[barbican][oslo][nova][glance][cinder] cursive library status

Ben Nemec openstack at nemebean.com
Wed Dec 16 18:50:15 UTC 2020

On 12/16/20 12:02 PM, Brian Rosmaita wrote:
> Hello Barbican team,
> Apologies for not including barbican in the previous thread on this topic:
> http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/2020-December/019430.html 
> The situation is that cursive is used by Nova, Glance, and Cinder and 
> we'd like to move it out of the 'x' namespace into openstack governance. 
>   The question is then what team would oversee it.  It seems like a good 
> fit for Oslo, and the Oslo team seems OK with that, but since 
> barbican-core is currently included in cursive-core, it make sense to 
> give the Barbican team first dibs.
>  From the consuming teams' side, I don't think we have a preference as 
> long as it's clear who we need to bother about approvals if a bugfix is 
> posted for review.
> Thus my ask is that the Barbican team indicate whether they'd like to 
> move cursive to the 'openstack' namespace under their governance, or 
> whether they'd prefer Oslo to oversee the library.

Note that this is not necessarily an either/or thing. Castellan is under 
Oslo governance but is co-owned by the Oslo and Barbican teams. We could 
do a similar thing with Cursive.

More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list