[cloudkitty][tc] Cloudkitty abandoned?

Rafael Weingärtner rafaelweingartner at gmail.com
Fri Aug 7 16:21:53 UTC 2020


I see. Thanks for the heads up. I will try to dedicate some time every week
for these tasks.

On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:22 PM Kendall Nelson <kennelson11 at gmail.com> wrote:

> I think the majority of 'maintenance' activities at the moment for
> Cloudkitty are the reviewing of open patches in gerrit [1] and triaging
> bugs that are reported in Launchpad[2] as they come in. When things come up
> on this mailing list that have the cloudkitty tag in the subject line (like
> this email), weighing in on them would also be helpful.
>
> If you need help getting setup with gerrit, I am happy to assist anyway I
> can :)
>
> -Kendall Nelson (diablo_rojo)
>
> [1]
> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/cloudkitty+OR+project:openstack/python-cloudkittyclient+OR+project:openstack/cloudkitty-dashboard
> [2] https://launchpad.net/cloudkitty
>
>
> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 6:21 AM Rafael Weingärtner <
> rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I am not sure how the projects/communities here in OpenStack are
>> maintained and conducted, but I could for sure help.
>> I am a committer and PMC for some Apache projects; therefore, I am a bit
>> familiar with some processes in OpenSource communities.
>>
>> On Tue, Aug 4, 2020 at 5:11 AM Mark Goddard <mark at stackhpc.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, 30 Jul 2020 at 14:43, Rafael Weingärtner
>>> <rafaelweingartner at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> >
>>> > We are working on it. So far we have 3 open proposals there, but we do
>>> not have enough karma to move things along.
>>> > Besides these 3 open proposals, we do have more ongoing extensions
>>> that have not yet been proposed to the community.
>>>
>>> It's good to hear you want to help improve cloudkitty, however it
>>> sounds like what is required is help with maintaining the project. Is
>>> that something you could be involved with?
>>> Mark
>>>
>>> >
>>> > On Thu, Jul 30, 2020 at 10:22 AM Sean McGinnis <sean.mcginnis at gmx.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> >>
>>> >> Posting here to raise awareness, and start discussion about next
>>> steps.
>>> >>
>>> >> It appears there is no one working on Cloudkitty anymore. No patches
>>> >> have been merged for several months now, including simple bot proposed
>>> >> patches. It would appear no one is maintaining this project anymore.
>>> >>
>>> >> I know there is a need out there for this type of functionality, so
>>> >> maybe this will raise awareness and get some attention to it. But
>>> >> barring that, I am wondering if we should start the process to retire
>>> >> this project.
>>> >>
>>> >>  From a Victoria release perspective, it is milestone-2 week, so we
>>> >> should make a decision if any of the Cloudkitty deliverables should be
>>> >> included in this release or not. We can certainly force releases of
>>> >> whatever is the latest, but I think that is a bit risky since these
>>> >> repos have never merged the job template change for victoria and
>>> >> therefore are not even testing with Python 3.8. That is an official
>>> >> runtime for Victoria, so we run the risk of having issues with the
>>> code
>>> >> if someone runs under 3.8 but we have not tested to make sure there
>>> are
>>> >> no problems doing so.
>>> >>
>>> >> I am hoping this at least starts the discussion. I will not propose
>>> any
>>> >> release patches to remove anything until we have had a chance to
>>> discuss
>>> >> the situation.
>>> >>
>>> >> Sean
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >
>>> >
>>> > --
>>> > Rafael Weingärtner
>>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Rafael Weingärtner
>>
>

-- 
Rafael Weingärtner
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200807/d07d0409/attachment.html>


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list