Open Stack

On 20-04-09 11:41:53, Ben Nemec wrote:
> 
> 
> On 4/6/20 10:28 PM, Ghanshyam Mann wrote:
> > ---- On Mon, 06 Apr 2020 19:46:53 -0500 Ghanshyam Mann <gmann at ghanshyammann.com> wrote ----
> >   > Hi,
> >   >
> >   > This is regarding the FFE request for policy for
> >   > - https://review.opendev.org/#/c/717879/
> >   >
> >   > This is part of introducing scope_type and new defaults in policies. During
> >   > Nova implemtnation[1], we came across two things to solve before we release
> >   > the new policies changes:
> >   > 1.  A lot of warnings as policy default are changing which end up filling the logs (226 MB n-api logs today).
> >   > 2. Give operators an option to switch to the new system (scope and new defaults) at the same time without overwriting the policy file.
> > 
> > Basically two patches, I proposed those separately
> > 1.   https://review.opendev.org/#/c/717879/
> > 2.   https://review.opendev.org/#/c/717943/
> 
> The first of these has already merged. Before I pull the trigger on the
> second, I want to make sure we're good on the FFE front. Given that these
> changes can't be backported and are fairly important for usability of the
> new policy work, I'm in favor of an FFE. Can someone from the release team
> weigh in too? Thanks.
> 

requirements is good with it

-- 
Matthew Thode
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20200409/1a6a49c7/attachment-0001.sig>