[tc][election] Simple question for the TC candidates

Sean Mooney smooney at redhat.com
Mon Apr 6 17:11:20 UTC 2020

On Mon, 2020-04-06 at 12:42 -0400, Jeremy Freudberg wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 6, 2020 at 3:19 AM Jean-Philippe Evrard
> <jean-philippe at evrard.me> wrote:
> > [...]
> > I like this. Should this be self-asserted by the teams, or should we
> > provide some kind of validation? For teams that are very close but have
> > other openstack services projects dependencies, should the TC work on
> > helping removing those dependencies?
> > [...]
> Yes the TC should support some kind of initiative to encourage
> standalone/reusability. I think self-assertion is fine at the start (I
> think this is really important info to publicize) ... but eventually
> there should be some kind of reference doc with clear criteria for
> what "standalone/reusable" actually means. Of course I'm really just
> thinking of services... libraries are another matter...
isnt that partly what constellations were ment to do

most of them unfrotnetely build on the compute kit
but it would be greate to have  version that did not need nova or neutorn
for example a storage kit that was just swift, keystone, cinder, glance and manila
or something similar.

a baremetal constalation that could be bifrost + ironic + optionally keystone and metal3?

i cant rememebr the name of the project that wanted to have a group of openstack compnets that
were useful for use in kubernetes but a constallation that showcased what comments were useful in
that context would also be great. 


More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list