choosing object storage
Mark Kirkwood
mark.kirkwood at catalyst.net.nz
Mon Apr 6 06:47:36 UTC 2020
There are a number of considerations (disclaimer we run Ceph block and
Swift object storage):
Purely on a level of simplicity, Swift is easier to set up.
However, if you are already using Ceph for block storage then it makes
sense to keep using it for object too (since you are likely to be expert
at Ceph at this point).
On the other hand, if you have multiple Ceph clusters and want a geo
replicated object storage solution, then doing this with Swift is much
easier than with Ceph (geo replicated RGW still looks to be real complex
to set up - a long page of archane commands).
Finally (this is my 'big deal point'). I'd like my block and object
storage to be completely independent - suppose a situation nukes my
block storage (Ceph) - if my object storage is Swift then people's
backups etc are still viable and when the Ceph cluster is rebuilt we can
restore and continue. On the other hand If your object storage is Ceph
too then....
regards
Mark
On 4/04/20 2:47 pm, Tessa Plum wrote:
> greetings,
>
> What object storage system to choose for integration with openstack
> environment? ceph or swift?
>
> Thank you.
>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list