[requirements] [ironic] FFE for python-ironicclient 3.1.0
Matthew Thode
mthode at mthode.org
Tue Sep 24 15:42:54 UTC 2019
On 19-09-24 17:34:32, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Sep 24, 2019 at 5:29 PM Matthew Thode <mthode at mthode.org> wrote:
>
> > On 19-09-24 17:22:01, Dmitry Tantsur wrote:
> > > Hi all,
> > >
> > > we would like to request an exception to release python-ironicclient
> > 3.1.0
> > > from the stable/train branch. The current 3.0.0 release has several
> > issues,
> > > one of them [1] is critical and breaks no-auth mode (used e.g. in
> > bifrost).
> > > I'm also proposing [2] to exclude python-ironicclient 3.0.0 from
> > > requirement.
> > >
> > > A release request will be posted once [3] merges. The minor version bump
> > is
> > > because we've made the previously existing implicit oslo.config
> > dependency
> > > explicit [4]. I don't believe the new release will break anyone who is
> > not
> > > broken by 3.0.0 already.
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > > Dmitry
> > >
> > > [1] https://storyboard.openstack.org/#!/story/2006600
> > > [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684376/
> > > [3] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684363/
> > > [4] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/684281/
> >
> > It looks like the following projects depend on python-ironicclient code.
> > Will they need to update their requirements and cause a re-release (I
> > suspect at least some of them will need to mask 3.0.0).
> >
>
> It may be desired for some projects to mask ironicclient 3.0.0 (I'll take
> care of bifrost). Bumping the version should not be required, if I
> understand the process right.
>
> Dmitry
>
I think that'll cause a re-release, or the next train release for that
project will just have it (which could be after 'release' time. As long
as those clients are happy to use 3.0.0 in train.
--
Matthew Thode
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190924/c220de4b/attachment.sig>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list