[i18n][mogan][neutron][swift][tc][valet] Cleaning up IRC logging for defunct channels

Akihiro Motoki amotoki at gmail.com
Wed Sep 18 01:44:35 UTC 2019


Thanks for the feedback.
I proposed a patch to stop gerrit notifications to #openstack-fwaas,
#openstack-vpnaas and #networking-sfc based on this thread.
https://review.opendev.org/682771

On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 9:45 PM Bernard Cafarelli <bcafarel at redhat.com> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 08:28, Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons at redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> > On 17 Sep 2019, at 07:11, Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:20 AM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Freenode imposes a hard limit of 120 simultaneously joined channels
>> >> for any single account. We've once again reached that limit with our
>> >> channel-logging meetbot. As a quick measure, I've proposed a bit of
>> >> cleanup: https://review.opendev.org/682500
>> >>
>> >> Analysis of IRC channel logs indicates the following have seen 5 or
>> >> fewer non-bot comments posted in the past 12 months and are likely
>> >> of no value to continue logging:
>> >>
>> >>    5 #openstack-vpnaas
>> >
>> > I would like to add the following channels to this list in addition to
>> > #openstack-vpnaas.
>> > This is what I think recently but I haven't discussed it yet with the team.
>> >
>> > - openstack-fwaas
>> > - networking-sfc
>>
>> Ha, I didn’t even know that such channels exists. And from what I can say, if there are any topics related to such stadium projects, we are discussing them on #openstack-neutron channel usually.
>> IMHO we can remove them too.
>
> Yes #networking-sfc was created almost 3 years ago when activity was higher, it was also used at some point for IRC meetings. These meetings have stopped and the channel is really quiet now.
> So it sounds like a good time to formalize the folding back in neutron chan
>>
>>
>> >
>> > I see only 5~20 members in these channels constantly.
>> > Developments in FWaaS and SFC are not so active, so I don't see a good
>> > reason to have a separate channel.
>> > They can be merged into the main neutron channel #openstack-neutron.
>> >
>> > Is there any guideline on how to guide users to migrate a channel to
>> > another channel?
>> >
>> > Thanks,
>> > Akihiro
>> >
>> >
>> >>    2 #swift3
>> >>    2 #openstack-ko
>> >>    1 #openstack-deployment
>> >>    1 #midonet
>> >>    0 #openstack-valet
>> >>    0 #openstack-swg
>> >>    0 #openstack-mogan
>> >>
>> >> Please let me know either here on the ML or with a comment on the
>> >> review linked above if you have a reason to continue logging any of
>> >> these channels. I'd like to merge it later this week if possible.
>> >> Thanks!
>> >> --
>> >> Jeremy Stanley
>> >
>>
>>>> Slawek Kaplonski
>> Senior software engineer
>> Red Hat
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Bernard Cafarelli



More information about the openstack-discuss mailing list