[i18n][mogan][neutron][swift][tc][valet] Cleaning up IRC logging for defunct channels
Bernard Cafarelli
bcafarel at redhat.com
Tue Sep 17 12:41:42 UTC 2019
On Tue, 17 Sep 2019 at 08:28, Slawek Kaplonski <skaplons at redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> > On 17 Sep 2019, at 07:11, Akihiro Motoki <amotoki at gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Sep 17, 2019 at 7:20 AM Jeremy Stanley <fungi at yuggoth.org>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Freenode imposes a hard limit of 120 simultaneously joined channels
> >> for any single account. We've once again reached that limit with our
> >> channel-logging meetbot. As a quick measure, I've proposed a bit of
> >> cleanup: https://review.opendev.org/682500
> >>
> >> Analysis of IRC channel logs indicates the following have seen 5 or
> >> fewer non-bot comments posted in the past 12 months and are likely
> >> of no value to continue logging:
> >>
> >> 5 #openstack-vpnaas
> >
> > I would like to add the following channels to this list in addition to
> > #openstack-vpnaas.
> > This is what I think recently but I haven't discussed it yet with the
> team.
> >
> > - openstack-fwaas
> > - networking-sfc
>
> Ha, I didn’t even know that such channels exists. And from what I can say,
> if there are any topics related to such stadium projects, we are discussing
> them on #openstack-neutron channel usually.
> IMHO we can remove them too.
>
Yes #networking-sfc was created almost 3 years ago when activity was
higher, it was also used at some point for IRC meetings. These meetings
have stopped and the channel is really quiet now.
So it sounds like a good time to formalize the folding back in neutron chan
>
> >
> > I see only 5~20 members in these channels constantly.
> > Developments in FWaaS and SFC are not so active, so I don't see a good
> > reason to have a separate channel.
> > They can be merged into the main neutron channel #openstack-neutron.
> >
> > Is there any guideline on how to guide users to migrate a channel to
> > another channel?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Akihiro
> >
> >
> >> 2 #swift3
> >> 2 #openstack-ko
> >> 1 #openstack-deployment
> >> 1 #midonet
> >> 0 #openstack-valet
> >> 0 #openstack-swg
> >> 0 #openstack-mogan
> >>
> >> Please let me know either here on the ML or with a comment on the
> >> review linked above if you have a reason to continue logging any of
> >> these channels. I'd like to merge it later this week if possible.
> >> Thanks!
> >> --
> >> Jeremy Stanley
> >
>
> —
> Slawek Kaplonski
> Senior software engineer
> Red Hat
>
>
>
--
Bernard Cafarelli
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190917/59bf7914/attachment.html>
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list