+1 On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 9:55 AM Michał Dulko <mdulko at redhat.com> wrote: > Hi, > > It's been more than a year after fuxi [1] and fuxi-kubernetes [2] were > declared as retired. First one was supposed to integrate Docker with > Cinder and Manila. The second was aiming to do the same with > Kubernetes. > > I'm not really sure how to serve the first use case, but it seems like > there are some alternatives [3], [4]. fuxi-kubernetes use case is now > served by Cloud Provider OpenStack in Cinder [5] and Manila [6] CSI > plugins, which seem like a much better fit. > > Currently the only maintained deliverables in kuryr project are kuryr, > kuryr-libnetwork and kuryr-kubernetes. All of them are related to > networking. Given that I'd like to propose rephrasing Kuryr mission > statement from: > > > Bridge between container framework networking and storage models > > to OpenStack networking and storage abstractions. > > to > > > Bridge between container framework networking models > > to OpenStack networking abstractions. > > effectively getting storage out of project scope. > > Are there any thoughts or objections? Maybe someone sees a better > phrasing? > > Thanks, > Michał > > [1] https://opendev.org/openstack/fuxi > [2] https://opendev.org/openstack/fuxi-kubernetes > [3] > https://rexray.readthedocs.io/en/stable/user-guide/schedulers/docker/plug-ins/openstack/ > [4] https://github.com/j-griffith/cinder-docker-driver > [5] > https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/blob/master/docs/using-cinder-csi-plugin.md > [6] > https://github.com/kubernetes/cloud-provider-openstack/blob/master/docs/using-manila-csi-plugin.md > > > -- LUIS TOMÁS BOLÍVAR Senior Software Engineer Red Hat Madrid, Spain ltomasbo at redhat.com -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20191029/77183dcf/attachment.html>