Open Stack

On 2019-10-17 18:38:15 +0200 (+0200), Roman Gorshunov wrote:
[...]
> I think it comes from the way how Apache 2.0 license needs to get
> applied
[...]

Well, the Sphinx configuration directive could be considered
independent from asserting copyright in individual source files.
It's a general blurb which the theme incorporates into the rendered
footer of all pages, so if some pages' content are copyrighted by
other contributing organizations then the copyright info displayed
on that page becomes incorrect. This is why it tends to be simpler
to just use a vague copyright entity in the Sphinx config field so
that some copyright is asserted/implied, while allowing the
individual copyrights of various files to differ from one another.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20191017/4a8cdfe1/attachment-0001.sig>