Update: > the nova-specs patch introducing > the "Core Liaison" concept [1]. This is merged (it's now called "Feature Liaison"). Here's the new spec template section [2] and the FAQ [3]. Thanks to those who helped shape it. > (A) Note that the idea of capping the number of specs is (mostly) > unrelated, and we still haven't closed on it. I feel like we've agreed > to have a targeted discussion around spec freeze time where we decide > whether to defer features for resource reasons. That would be a new (and > good, IMO) thing. But it's still TBD whether "30 approved for 25 > completed" will apply, and/or what criteria would be used to decide what > gets cut. Nothing new here. efried > [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/685857 [2] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/specs/ussuri/implemented/ussuri-template.html#feature-liaison [3] http://specs.openstack.org/openstack/nova-specs/readme.html#feature-liaison-faq