[meta-sig][multi-arch] propose forming a Multi-arch SIG
glongwave at gmail.com
Tue Nov 26 03:45:53 UTC 2019
Glad to see that we plan to form a SIG to better support ARM64 and other
architecture CPUs, I think we can do something in the SIG, functional
tests, performance data share, share best practices.
BTW, we also have slides for the forum , find it at
Jeremy Freudberg <jeremyfreudberg at gmail.com> 于2019年11月23日周六 上午12:46写道：
> building stuff (packages, containers, images)
> fixing deployment tooling -- some tools might barf if you have a mix of
> a bit of evangelism
> probably more...
> On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 11:16 AM <Arkady.Kanevsky at dell.com> wrote:
> > Sounds interesting..
> > But not clear what is the goal for that SIG?
> > Since OpenStack claims to have support for different HW.
> > Are there any additional reqs? Clearly CI ones.
> > Thanks,
> > Arkady
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Tony Breeds <tony at bakeyournoodle.com>
> > Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2019 10:05 PM
> > To: Rico Lin
> > Cc: OpenStack Discuss
> > Subject: Re: [meta-sig][multi-arch] propose forming a Multi-arch SIG
> > On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 06:03:03PM +0800, Rico Lin wrote:
> > > Dear all
> > > In summit, there's a forum for ARM support  in Summit which many
> > > people show they're interested in ARM support for OpenStack.
> > > And since also we have Linaro shows interest in donating servers to
> > > OpenStack infra. It's time for community to think about what we should
> > > deal with those ARM servers once we have them in community
> > >
> > > One thing we should do as a community is to gather people for this
> > > So I propose we create a Multi-arch SIG and aim to support ARM
> > > architecture as very first step.
> > > I had the idea to call it ARM SIG before, but since there might be
> > > high overlap knowledge between support ARM 64 and other architectures.
> > > I propose we go for Multi-arch instead.
> > >
> > > This SIG will be a nice place to collect all the documents, gate jobs,
> > > and to trace tasks.
> > >
> > > If you're also interested in that group, please reply to this email,
> > > introduce yourself and tell us what you would like the group scope and
> > > objectives to be, and what you can contribute to the group.
> > Pick me Pick me :)
> > I've been around OpenStack for about 5 years now, the last couple have
> been focused on brining multi-arch support (albeit ppc64le) into tripleo
> building on the enablement work that others have done.
> > I'm keen to work with the SIG, to build out the ARM support and at the
> same time ensure we don't make it hard for other architectures to do the
> > Yours Tony.
Community Director @EasyStack
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the openstack-discuss