Open Stack

Hi,

Yes, after some discussions on IRC I think that it will be better to simple
retire project as it has no any activity since it was created.

Finally I have 5 patches to retire this project. See [1] for them.

[1] https://review.opendev.org/#/q/topic:neutron-interconnection-retire+(status:open+OR+status:merged)

On Fri, Nov 15, 2019 at 01:28:17PM +0100, Andreas Jaeger wrote:
> On 15/11/2019 09.56, Slawek Kaplonski wrote:
> > Hi neutrinos,
> > 
> > As we discussed during the Shanghai PTG I just proposed changes to move
> > neutron-interconnection project out of stadium to "x/" namespace.
> > So it will not be official neutron project anymore after those changes.
> > Patches for that are in [1] and [2]
> > 
> > I also proposed to remove neutron-interconnection api-ref from neutron-lib.
> > Patch is here [3]. Please review it :)
> > 
> > [1] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694478/
> > [2] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694480/
> > [3] https://review.opendev.org/#/c/694466/
> > 
> 
> Looking at
> https://review.opendev.org/#/q/project:openstack/neutron-interconnection
> 
> I suggest to retire only with those few changes to the repo - and
> nothing in the last few months.
> 
> Or is there anybody committing to continue the work?
> 
> We can also retire now - and create again in the "x/" namespace if
> interest suddenly arises. But let's not move repos that are de-facto
> dead around,
> 
> Andreas
> -- 
>  Andreas Jaeger aj at suse.com Twitter: jaegerandi
>   SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, D 90409 Nürnberg
>    (HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg) GF: Felix Imendörffer
>     GPG fingerprint = 93A3 365E CE47 B889 DF7F  FED1 389A 563C C272 A126
> 

-- 
Slawek Kaplonski
Senior software engineer
Red Hat