[nova][ironic][ptg] Resource tracker scaling issues
Matt Riedemann
mriedemos at gmail.com
Mon Nov 11 20:01:48 UTC 2019
On 11/11/2019 7:03 AM, Chris Dent wrote:
> Or using
> separate processes? For the ironic and vsphere contexts, increased
> CPU usage by the nova-compute process does not impact on the
> workload resources, so parallization is likely a good option.
I don't know how much it would help - someone would have to actually
test it out and get metrics - but one easy win might just be using a
thread or process executor pool here [1] so that N compute nodes could
be processed through the update_available_resource periodic task
concurrently, maybe $ncpu or some factor thereof. By default make it
serialized for backward compatibility and non-ironic deployments. Making
that too highly concurrent could have negative impacts on other things
running on that host, like the neutron agent, or potentially storming
conductor/rabbit with a ton of DB requests from that compute.
That doesn't help with the scenario that the big
COMPUTE_RESOURCE_SEMAPHORE lock is held by the periodic task while
spawning, moving, or deleting an instance that also needs access to the
big lock to update the resource tracker, but baby steps if any steps in
this area of the code would be my recommendation.
[1]
https://github.com/openstack/nova/blob/20.0.0/nova/compute/manager.py#L8629
--
Thanks,
Matt
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list