Open Stack

On 2019-05-31 10:24:36 -0400 (-0400), Erik McCormick wrote:
[...]
> there's a project [1].
> 
> So either:
> A) Make a SIG out of that and assign the repos to the sig, or
> B) Maybe add it under / rename the Ops Docs SIG [2] as it might bring
> more eyes to both things which serve the same folks.
[...]

I'd also be perfectly fine with C) say that it's being vouched for
by the UC through its Osops project, stick these repos in a list
*somewhere* as a durable record of that, and let decisions about
project vs. SIG decision be independent of the repository naming
decision.
-- 
Jeremy Stanley
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 963 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190531/be674e4b/attachment.sig>