Open Stack

> On May 31, 2019, at 9:52 AM, Mohammed Naser <mnaser at vexxhost.com> wrote:
> 
> 
> 
> On Fri., May 31, 2019, 9:49 a.m. Doug Hellmann, <doug at doughellmann.com <mailto:doug at doughellmann.com>> wrote:
> Mohammed Naser <mnaser at vexxhost.com <mailto:mnaser at vexxhost.com>> writes:
> 
> > On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 8:35 AM Jonathan D. Proulx <jon at csail.mit.edu <mailto:jon at csail.mit.edu>> wrote:
> >>
> >> On Fri, May 31, 2019 at 07:50:45AM -0400, Doug Hellmann wrote:
> >>
> >> :My vote is a hard "no" on an openstack-operators/ namespace because I'm
> >> :tired of perpetuating the idea that "operators" cannot (or should not)
> >> :be "contributors" to openstack/. They *must* be contributors, because
> >> :that's the only way open source works over the log term.
> >>
> >> what Doug said!
> >>
> >> The most important and perhaps most difficult thing in OpenSource is
> >> the bravery to be bad in public. This is why the worst thing in
> >> OpenSource is shaming people for being bad in public.
> >
> > That sounds fair.  It seems there is significant thoughts from within
> > the community
> > that this should continue to live under the openstack/ namespace.
> >
> > How do we make this happen then?  I'm struggling to find the correct platform to
> > put this under in order to make this live under openstack/
> 
> What part is hard, defining an owner?
> 
> Yes.  A SIG?  A WG?

I thought we had converted everything that wasn’t a Board working group to a SIG. A SIG seems appropriate for this, in any case.

Doug

> 
> I'm not sure where to put it under to make it official under OpenStack namespace. 
> 
> I'm happy to hear suggestions
> 
> -- 
> Doug

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.openstack.org/pipermail/openstack-discuss/attachments/20190531/bcb54d59/attachment-0001.html>