[nova] "future" specs and blueprints
Matt Riedemann
mriedemos at gmail.com
Thu Mar 28 13:47:50 UTC 2019
On 3/28/2019 4:21 AM, Sean Mooney wrote:
> i am personally not a fan of updating spec after they have been appoved but
> since that is something we allow it makes sense to me to make it easier too do.
Ideally people wouldn't need to update specs after they are approved,
but each spec varies in how much detail it has and those details can
change once you get into code review, so sometimes it's good to update
the spec later so it's not misleading if someone is reading the spec
because there is otherwise a lack of docs about the feature. The best
way to avoid having to update specs after approval IMO is to make sure
when developing a feature you also have solid documentation outside of
the spec to go with it, and sometimes getting developers to write useful
feature documentation is like pulling teeth.
--
Thanks,
Matt
More information about the openstack-discuss
mailing list